AsyncLocalStorage is captured on the first console.log which prevents garbage collection of objects in the storage
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- JavaScript
- Estrellas
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Merge medio
- 4 d 2 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 283
Descripción
Version
v20.3.0
Platform
Linux 5.19.0-46-generic #47~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Wed Jun 21 15:35:31 UTC 2 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
async_hooks
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Run the following with node --expose-gc:
import { AsyncLocalStorage } from "node:async_hooks";
const storage = new AsyncLocalStorage();
const finalizer = new FinalizationRegistry((token) => {
console.log("COLLECTED", token);
});
const wr = new WeakRef({});
finalizer.register(wr.deref(), "obj");
// Whether COLLECTED is printed depends on whether this is present or not
// console.log("OUTER LOG");
storage.run({ obj: wr.deref() }, () => {
console.log(storage.getStore()?.obj);
});
await new Promise((resolve) => setTimeout(resolve, 1000));
gc();
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
This happens consistently.
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
The object stored in the WeakRef should be collected when gc() is hit, but whether this happens depends on whether the line:
// console.log("OUTER LOG");
is commented or not.
What do you see instead?
The object is not collected if the first console.log happens under the storage.run callback.
Additional information
For whatever reason wherever the first console.log happens this is where the async resource for the TTY is made. This causes objects in the AsyncLocalStorage to be eternally referenced and never eligible for garbage collection.
To allow GC of values in AsyncLocalStorage, the fix here would be to simply create the TTY's async resource using the root's async scope rather than whatever happens to be active.
(I can't see large reason why the current behaviour would be desirable as it just makes GC of values dependent on first console.log. If anyone needed such behaviour legitimately it'd make more sense to expose an initTTY function or similar that captures the async scope at that time).
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza ejecutando la reproducción proporcionada con node --expose-gc e inspecciona el manejo de async_hooks del recurso TTY creado por el primer console.log. Traza cómo ese recurso captura el async scope activo; se considera terminado cuando el objeto puede ser recolectado independientemente de si el console.log externo se ejecuta primero, con una prueba de regresión para ambos casos.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- javascript
- Área
- backend
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Activo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 52/100