nodejs / nodejs/node

Missing import trace from error stack when loading a module throws an error

Open
#46,992 30 comments 11 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

esm feature request
Dominant language
JavaScript
Stars
122k
Forks
37.3k
Avg merge
4d 2h
Merged PRs (30d)
283

Description

Version

v16.16.0

Platform

Linux 5.4.0-139-generic #156-Ubuntu SM x86_64 GNU/Linux

Subsystem

modules

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Consider:

// foo.mjs
import './bar.mjs';
// bar.mjs
throw new Error('bar failed');

Run node foo.mjs.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Always.

What is the expected behavior?

The stack trace from the error should include a reference to foo.mjs line 1 showing where bar was imported from.

What do you see instead?
file:///.../bar.mjs:1
throw new Error('bar failed');
      ^

Error: bar failed
    at file:///.../bar.mjs:1:7
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:198:25)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async ESMLoader.import (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:385:24)
    at async loadESM (node:internal/process/esm_loader:88:5)
    at async handleMainPromise (node:internal/modules/run_main:61:12)

Note that the stack trace does not mention foo anywhere. This is not helpful, especially if the error is specifically about how and when bar is imported. For example, it might be a singleton and you're mistakenly creating a duplicate by loading it from both import and require, or it might need something else to be set up on the global first and you're loading it in the wrong order.

The above stack is from node 16. Node 18 produces a shorter but similarly lacking stack:

file:///.../bar.mjs:1
throw new Error('bar failed');
      ^

Error: bar failed
    at file:///.../bar.mjs:1:7
    at ModuleJob.run (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:194:25)
Additional information

I am aware that import() and top-level await complicates this, since modules may be effectively loading in parallel (asynchronously behind the scenes). However, it is absolutely essential that this information is made available somehow.

If the output ends up being a list of all modules trying to load the offending module then great, as long as this list is in the order the imports were encountered then that should allow debugging this kind of thing.

At the moment when this occurs it's simply impossible to debug. Since import gets hoisted by the language you can't even add console.log statements around the place to trace what's happening like you can with require. Literally the only option to debug this is to comment out all the imports and re-enable one-by-one (recursively) until you locate the problem. And in practice this inevitably breaks something else, so it's completely unworkable.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the issue with the foo.mjs and bar.mjs modules using node foo.mjs, then inspect the modules subsystem involved in ESM loading. Trace how errors propagate through the module import and loading path. Done means the resulting stack information identifies foo.mjs line 1, while accounting for the asynchronous import cases described.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
javascript
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.