AsyncLocalStorage instance shared between several http requests
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- JavaScript
- Sterne
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Ø Merge
- 4 T. 2 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 283
Beschreibung
Version
v17.5.0
Platform
Linux DESKTOP 5.10.60.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 #1 SMP Wed Aug 25 23:20:18 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
async_hooks
What steps will reproduce the bug?
Opening localhost:3000/ in Chrome (keep-alive) shows that we have access to the same instance of AsyncLocalStorage when we serve both / and /favicon.ico. I would understand if both of them were coming from the same async resource representing connection and there was no distinction, but log (see below) produced by async hooks shows that there was two separate HTTPINCOMINGMESSAGE but when it comes to request listener suddenly we have same asyncId.
May be it is not a bug, but observed behavior is very confusing. I've read that
import * as http from "node:http";
import * as events from "node:events";
import * as async_hooks from "node:async_hooks";
await events.once(http.createServer(httpHandler).listen(3000), "listening");
console.log("server started");
const currentRequest = new async_hooks.AsyncLocalStorage();
// Create hook to ensure t
async_hooks
.createHook({
init(asyncId, type) {
if (type === "TickObject" || type === "TickTimeout") return;
console.log(asyncId, type);
},
})
.enable();
function getCurrentRequestExn() {
const current = currentRequest.getStore();
if (!current) throw new Error("no current request");
return current;
}
function setCurrentRequest(req) {
console.log(
"setCurrentRequest %s %d",
req.url,
async_hooks.executionAsyncId()
);
const existing = currentRequest.getStore();
if (existing !== void 0) throw new Error("current request already set");
currentRequest.enterWith(req);
}
function httpHandler(req, res) {
setCurrentRequest(req);
if (req.url === "/") res.end(route1());
else if (req.url === "/favicon.ico") res.end(route2());
}
function route1() {
const req = getCurrentRequestExn();
return "route1 " + req.url;
}
function route2() {
const req = getCurrentRequestExn();
return "route2" + req.url;
}
Log produced:
server started
20 TCPWRAP
22 HTTPINCOMINGMESSAGE
24 TCPWRAP
26 HTTPINCOMINGMESSAGE
setCurrentRequest / 22
29 Timeout
34 Timeout
setCurrentRequest /favicon.ico 22
And, since we accessing same instance of the async local storage - then there is an exception:
file:///home/dolphin/projects/komsomol/server.js:33
if (existing !== void 0) throw new Error("current request already set");
^
Error: current request already set
at setCurrentRequest (file:///home/dolphin/projects/komsomol/server.js:33:34)
at Server.httpHandler (file:///home/dolphin/projects/komsomol/server.js:38:3)
at Server.emit (node:events:526:28)
at parserOnIncoming (node:_http_server:951:12)
at HTTPParser.parserOnHeadersComplete (node:_http_common:128:17)
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
All the time.
What is the expected behavior?
Separate instances of AsyncLocalStorage for each request, or some explanation in documentation on how to achieve it.
What do you see instead?
Same instances of AsyncLocalStorage shared between http requests contexts when requests made using keep-alive connection.
Additional information
No response
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne damit, die Reproduktion in server.js mit einer keep-alive-Browserverbindung auszuführen und die async_hooks-Ausgabe für beide Requests zu vergleichen. Verfolge dann den Request-Pfad durch parserOnIncoming in node:_http_server sowie das im Issue beschriebene Verhalten von AsyncLocalStorage. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die Request-Kontexte korrekt unterschieden werden oder das unterstützte Verhalten und die erforderliche Verwendung dokumentiert sind.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- javascript, nodejs
- Bereich
- backend
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 48/100