nodejs / nodejs/node

Stop throwing for unsupported options in `Worker`'s `execArgv` and `env.NODE_OPTIONS`.

未关闭
#41,103 14 条评论 15 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

worker
主要语言
JavaScript
星标
122k
派生
37.4k
平均合并
4 天 3 小时
30 天内合并 PR
272

描述

Version

v17.2.0

Platform

No response

Subsystem

worker_threads

What steps will reproduce the bug?

Consider this test.js file:

const { isMainThread, Worker } = require("worker_threads");

if (isMainThread) {
  new Worker(__filename, {
    // execArgv: process.execArgv
  });
} else {
  console.log("Hello from the worker!", process.execArgv);
}

NOTE: --experimental-json-modules and --title are just examples

Run these two commands:

node --experimental-json-modules test.js
node --experimental-json-modules --title foo test.js

They will log

Hello from the worker! [ '--experimental-json-modules' ]
Hello from the worker! [ '--experimental-json-modules', '--title', 'foo' ]

Now, uncomment the execArgv: process.execArgv line and run the two commands again. The first command will still log

Hello from the worker! [ '--experimental-json-modules' ]

however, the second one throws:

Error [ERR_WORKER_INVALID_EXEC_ARGV]: Initiated Worker with invalid execArgv flags: --title
    at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:371:5)
    at new Worker (node:internal/worker:191:13)
    at Object.<anonymous> (/home/nicolo/Documenti/dev/babel/babel/test.js:4:3)
    at Module._compile (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1097:14)
    at Object.Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1149:10)
    at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:975:32)
    at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:822:12)
    at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:81:12)
    at node:internal/main/run_main_module:17:47 {
  code: 'ERR_WORKER_INVALID_EXEC_ARGV'
}

This mans that the default behavior of the Worker execArgv option is not to inherit execArgv from the parent thread (contrary to what the documentation says).

Why would you want to explicitly pass execArgv: process.execArgv anyway?

A few days ago I was trying to implement a require hook that internally uses a Worker, and in order to avoid registering it recursively in an infinite worker-spawn loop I tried to filter out the --require flag:

new Worker(workerFile, {
  execArgv: process.execArgv.filter((val, i, argv) => val === "--requrie" || argv[i-1] === "--requrie"),
});

this seemed to work, until it crashed in a test that was using the --expose_gc option.

Today, I found the exact same problem in jest-worker (a Jest subpackage that is often also used outside of Jest): https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/12103 was opened because jest-worker didn't work when running Node.js with --max_old_space_size.

Since Node.js doesn't provide the list of flags supported by workers progrmmatically (and I didn't find it in the docs either 😅) there is no way to filter the execArgv used by a worker.

What is the current behavior?

I initially expected the real default behavior to be something like execArgv: process.execArgv.filter(isSupportedByWorker), but it looks like it's not either. Consider for example the --expose_gc (which is disallowed in workers) option with this example:

const { isMainThread, Worker } = require("worker_threads");

if (isMainThread) {
  new Worker(__filename);
} else {
  console.log("Hello from the worker!", process.execArgv, globalThis.gc);
}

If you run node --expose_gc test.js, it will log

Hello from the worker! [ '--expose_gc' ] [Function: gc]

You can see that the gc function is present. This means that the disallowed flags are not ignored (and not even "ignored but still used to populate the process.execArgv array): they are used and affect the runtime behavior.

How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?

Only for the options marked as "unsupported" in workers.

What is the expected behavior?

I see four possible solutions:

  • Just ignore the unsupported options
  • Never throw, but warn when passing an unsupported option to a worker (potentially even if it's passed by default without an explicit execArgv).
  • Only throw if the unsupported option is not also used as an execArgv of the parent thread.
  • Always throw for unsupported options (so that execArgv: process.execArgv becomes the default behavior), and provide a Worker.filterExecArgv utility that removes disallowed options, and that I would have used like
    Worker.filterExecArgv(process.execArgv).filter((val, i, argv) => val === "--requrie" || argv[i-1] === "--requrie")
    

If the current behavior is expected, then the docs should be updated to mention that the default value cannot be replicated by explicitly passing an execArgv option.

What do you see instead?

No response

Additional information

No response

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

先从使用 --experimental-json-modules、--title 和 --expose_gc 的 test.js worker_threads 复现开始,然后阅读 Worker execArgv 文档和入口点。该 issue 提出了几种互不兼容的行为选项,因此应首先确定对不受支持的 execArgv 和 env.NODE_OPTIONS 的预期处理方式;完成内容应包括匹配的行为和测试覆盖率。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
javascript, node.js
领域
backend
Issue 类型
功能
难度
5/5
预计耗时
一周以上
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
35/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。