regression: child_process stdin pipe close event not emitted
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- JavaScript
- Sterne
- 122k
- Forks
- 37.3k
- Ø Merge
- 4 T. 2 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 283
Beschreibung
Summary
- Version: v8.12.0 and newer, all v10.x and all v11.x
- Platform: Linux and macOS amd64
- Subsystem: child_process
Since #18701 Node.js doesn't emit a close event when a child process closes its stdin pipe. The close is only detected if the parent tries to write to the child's stdin and receives an EPIPE.
The original behaviour is preferable because it allows immediate detection of the close event, rather than waiting for a failed write.
Reproducer
This works as expected in v8.11.4 and fails in all newer versions of v8.x, as well as all v10.x and all v11.x.
const {spawn} = require('child_process');
const cp = spawn(
'node', [
'-e',
'fs.closeSync(0); setTimeout(() => {}, 2000)'
],
{stdio: ['pipe', 'inherit', 'inherit']}
)
setTimeout(() => {
console.log('BUGGY! stdin close event was not emitted')
process.exit(1);
}, 1000);
cp.stdin.on('close', () => {
console.log('Ok!')
process.exit(0);
});
Problem detail
As far as I can tell the only way the close event can be emitted is if the Socket constructor calls this.read(0). This triggers onStreamRead() to be called, which does stream.push(null) and eventually results in the close event. This is a little weird because stdin isn't a readable stream :)
In Node 8.11.4 this worked because child_process.js:createSocket() called the Socket constructor with options.readable === undefined. So the Socket constructor sees that options.readable !== false and runs this.read(0)
In PR #18701 createSocket() was changed to call the Socket constructor with options.readable === true. This stops this.read(0) from being called and the close event is not emitted.
Hacky solution
--- a/lib/internal/child_process.js
+++ b/lib/internal/child_process.js
@@ -286,3 +286,3 @@ function flushStdio(subprocess) {
function createSocket(pipe, readable) {
- return net.Socket({ handle: pipe, readable, writable: !readable });
+ return net.Socket({ handle: pipe, readable, writable: !readable, childProcess: true });
}
--- a/lib/net.js
+++ b/lib/net.js
@@ -315,3 +315,5 @@ function Socket(options) {
// buffer. if not, then this will happen when we connect
- if (this._handle && options.readable !== false) {
+ if (options.childProcess) {
+ this.read(0);
+ } else if (this._handle && options.readable !== false) {
if (options.pauseOnCreate) {
This passes the full test suite with a minor change to test-pipewrap.js. I haven't raised a PR because I'm sure somebody could think of a better solution. If someone can point me in the right direction I'm happy to try and implement it.
Thanks :)
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit lib/internal/child_process.js und lib/net.js und vergleiche anschließend die Änderung bei der Socket-Erstellung aus #18701. Führe den bereitgestellten child_process-Reproducer aus und untersuche test-pipewrap.js einschließlich der im Issue erwähnten geringfügigen Änderung. Fertig ist die Arbeit, wenn stdin zeitnah close ausgibt, sobald der Child-Prozess die Pipe schließt, und die relevanten Tests bestehen.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- javascript, node.js
- Bereich
- backend, operating-systems
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 48/100