Better process for communicating feedback to members by the TSC

Hey,

The moderation team has a pretty simple process where when we want to provide feedback to an individual or take a moderation action typically the process is:

• We post in chat.
• We collect feedback from other team members for a bit (a few hours)
• We take the action (e.g. sending the email).

In the TSC, we don't really have a clear process for "how long should I wait before speaking for the TSC about feedback for an individual?" so whenever we discuss people we often take a long time to respond sometimes creating a lot of frustration and cases where people are waiting for feedback for a long time needlessly.

cc @aduh95 in particular who is active in both groups and probably feels this :] (as a side note, thanks ❤️ )

Rather than suggest a solution (I have several) I figured it'd be a good idea to let @nodejs/tsc suggest (hopefully!) a short/clear process for escalating these sort of issues. Ideally in a way where we don't wait for more than 72h if we don't have to meet and 1w if we do.

I am posting this in public since in general I try to keep governance discussions as public as possible but obvious I won't name any concrete examples where feedback was provided or actions taken for privacy.

Empieza con el proceso existente del equipo de moderación para este issue: publicar en el chat, recopilar feedback y actuar después. Revisa el debate del TSC y define un proceso de escalación corto y claro, con respuestas en un plazo de 72 horas cuando no sea necesaria una reunión y de una semana cuando sea necesaria una reunión; se considera terminado cuando el proceso acordado está documentado y adoptado.