modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Server ClientAuthenticator requires client_id in token body, rejecting valid client_secret_basic requests (RFC 6749 §2.3.1)
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Merge médio
- 1d 1h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 31
Descrição
Summary
The server-side ClientAuthenticator reads client_id only from the token request form body and raises invalid_client: "Missing client_id" when it is absent — even when the client authenticated correctly via HTTP Basic (Authorization: Basic base64(client_id:client_secret)). Per RFC 6749 §2.3.1, a client using client_secret_basic sends its client_id and client_secret in the Authorization header and MAY omit them from the body. Servers advertising client_secret_basic in token_endpoint_auth_methods_supported therefore reject spec-compliant clients (e.g. clients that use Basic and do not duplicate client_id into the body).
Location
src/mcp/server/auth/middleware/client_auth.py, authenticate_request:
form_data = await request.form()
client_id = form_data.get("client_id")
if not client_id:
raise AuthenticationError("Missing client_id")
...
if client.token_endpoint_auth_method == "client_secret_basic":
...
basic_client_id, request_client_secret = decoded.split(":", 1)
basic_client_id = unquote(basic_client_id)
if basic_client_id != client_id: # only cross-checks; never used as fallback
raise AuthenticationError("Client ID mismatch in Basic auth")
client_id from the Basic header is only used to cross-check a body-supplied value; it is never used as a fallback source. So a request with credentials solely in the Basic header fails before the client is even looked up.
Steps to reproduce
- Register a client with
token_endpoint_auth_method=client_secret_basic. POST /tokenwithgrant_type=authorization_code,Authorization: Basic base64(client_id:client_secret), and noclient_id/client_secretin the form body.- Response:
401 {"error":"invalid_client","error_description":"Missing client_id"}.
Sending the same credentials via client_secret_post (in the body) works.
Expected
When Authorization: Basic is present, the authenticator should derive client_id from the header if it is absent from the body (RFC 6749 §2.3.1), then verify the secret as it does today.
Notes
This is the mirror image of client-side PR #3536 (which stops MCP clients from putting client_id in the body under client_secret_basic). With that client-side change, compliant clients will send client_id only in the Basic header — which this server-side code rejects. The two need to agree.
Observed on mcp 1.27.0.
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Direção de pesquisa
Comece em src/mcp/server/auth/middleware/client_auth.py, em authenticate_request, e acompanhe como os campos do formulário e as credenciais HTTP Basic são analisados. Reproduza a requisição do token com as credenciais somente no cabeçalho Authorization e, em seguida, verifique se a autenticação client_secret_basic é bem-sucedida, enquanto credenciais incompatíveis continuam produzindo o erro de autenticação documentado.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- api, authentication
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Dificuldade
- 2/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-3 horas
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 76/100