modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

MCPServer has no x-mcp-header declaration mechanism and never validates one, so an invalid annotation is served happily and dropped by every client

Offen
#3,484 3 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

spec-2026-07-28 v2
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
24.3k
Forks
4k
Ø Merge
1 T. 1 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
31

Beschreibung

Summary

MCPServer offers no way to mark a tool parameter with x-mcp-header, and does not validate the annotation when one is smuggled in through pydantic. A server author who gets it wrong gets no signal at all: the tool is served happily, and every conforming client silently drops it.

SEP-2243's Reference Implementation section names this as a server-SDK requirement:

  • Server SDKs: Provide a mechanism (attribute/decorator) for marking parameters with x-mcp-header
  • Client SDKs: Implement the client behavior for extracting and encoding header values
  • Validation: Both sides must validate header/body consistency

The client half is implemented. The server half is not: x-mcp-header appears in mcp/client/session.py, mcp/shared/inbound.py and mcp_types/_v2026_07_28/, and nowhere under mcp/server/.

1. No declaration mechanism

The only route is pydantic passthrough:

@server.tool()
async def fetch(
    owner: Annotated[str, Field(json_schema_extra={"x-mcp-header": "owner"})],
) -> str:
    ...

This works — the annotation reaches inputSchema, the client mirrors it, mcp/shared/inbound.py validates it — so this is an ergonomics and discoverability gap rather than a functional one. But it means the feature is invisible from the server API, and that a server author must know the extension keyword's exact spelling from the spec.

2. Nothing validates the declaration server-side

This is the part that fails silently. SEP-2243 puts type restrictions on x-mcp-header and assigns their enforcement to the server:

| Test Case | Property Type | x-mcp-header Present | Expected Behavior |
| Array type | "type": "array" | Yes | Server MUST reject tool definition |
| Object type | "type": "object" | Yes | Server MUST reject tool definition |
| Null type | "type": "null" | Yes | Server MUST reject tool definition |

MCPServer rejects none of them.

import anyio
from typing import Annotated
from pydantic import Field
from mcp.client import Client
from mcp.client._memory import InMemoryTransport
from mcp.server.mcpserver import MCPServer

server = MCPServer("repro")

@server.tool()
async def bad(
    tags: Annotated[list[str], Field(json_schema_extra={"x-mcp-header": "Tags"})],
) -> str:
    """An array parameter annotated x-mcp-header -- the spec says reject."""
    return "ok"

async def main() -> None:
    async with Client(InMemoryTransport(server), mode="auto") as client:
        print("negotiated:", client.protocol_version)
        result = await client.list_tools()
        print("tools the client kept:", [t.name for t in result.tools])

anyio.run(main)

Output on mcp 2.1.1:

WARNING  dropping tool 'bad': invalid x-mcp-header (property 'tags':
         x-mcp-header is only permitted on integer/string/boolean
         properties (got 'array'))
negotiated: 2026-07-28
tools the client kept: []

Registration succeeded, startup succeeded, tools/list served it. The client — correctly, per the client-side MUST — drops it. So the failure mode is a tool that exists on the server and is invisible to every client, with the only diagnostic emitted in the client's process, which in a real deployment belongs to someone else.

The validator that would catch this already exists and is already imported by the server package's transport: find_invalid_x_mcp_header in mcp/shared/inbound.py. It is simply never run against a tool the server itself is registering.

Suggested fixes
  1. Run find_invalid_x_mcp_header at tool-registration time and raise. This is the one that matters: it turns a silent cross-process failure into an error at the line that caused it, and it reuses code that is already there.
  2. A first-class declaration API, so the extension keyword does not have to be spelled by hand — whatever shape fits the SDK's conventions, e.g. Annotated[str, McpHeader("Region")].

Happy to open a PR for (1) if the direction is agreeable.

Environment
  • mcp 2.1.1, mcp-types 2.1.1, Python 3.12.9
  • Both reproductions negotiate 2026-07-28

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Beginne mit find_invalid_x_mcp_header in mcp/shared/inbound.py und verfolge, wie Tools unter mcp/server/ registriert werden. Füge Abdeckung für ungültige Array-, Objekt- und Null-Deklarationen hinzu und überprüfe anschließend, dass die Registrierung sie ablehnt, anstatt Tools bereitzustellen, die Clients stillschweigend verwerfen.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
python
Bereich
api, backend
Issue-Typ
Bug
Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
55/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.