modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
ClientSessionGroup raises KeyError when a server exposes no tools, resources or prompts
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- Python
- 星號
- 24.3k
- 分支
- 4k
- 平均合併
- 1 天 1 小時
- 30 天內合併 PR
- 31
描述
Initial Checks
- I confirm that I'm using the newest release of my line (the latest 2.x, or the latest 1.x if I'm still on v1)
- I confirm that I searched for my issue in https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues before opening this issue
Release line
2.x (current stable), and it reproduces on the latest 1.x too.
Description
Connecting a ClientSessionGroup to a server that registers nothing fails with a raw KeyError. A server that registers even one tool, resource or prompt is fine.
_aggregate_components ends with this cleanup step, which only runs when all three list calls came back empty (session_group.py:420 on 2.1.0):
# Clean up exit stack for session if we couldn't retrieve anything
# from the server.
if not any((prompts_temp, resources_temp, tools_temp)):
del self._session_exit_stacks[session] # pragma: no cover
Two different things go wrong depending on how you got there.
Via connect_with_session(), the key was never inserted, so the del raises KeyError. That is the traceback below.
Via connect_to_server(), the key does exist, so the del succeeds. It removes the bookkeeping entry without closing the stack. The next lines then register the session in self._sessions anyway, so the group reports the session as connected while holding no way to close it. Calling disconnect_from_server() afterwards takes the session_known_for_stack is False branch and returns without closing anything, so the transport stays open until the whole group is torn down. I confirmed this by pre-registering a stack with a close callback and watching the callback never fire.
What I expected: connecting to a server that exposes nothing should either succeed with an empty component set, or fail with a clear error. If the group decides to drop the session, the exit stack should be closed rather than forgotten.
Two smaller things in the same condition, for whoever picks this up. The comment says "clean up exit stack" but the code only forgets it. And not any(...) treats "the server legitimately exposes nothing" and "all three list calls raised" as the same case, which may deserve separating.
Example Code
import anyio
import mcp_types as types
from mcp.client.client import Client
from mcp.client.session_group import ClientSessionGroup
from mcp.server.mcpserver import MCPServer
INFO = types.Implementation(name="empty", version="1.0")
async def main() -> None:
# A server that registers no tools, no resources and no prompts.
async with Client(MCPServer("empty")) as client:
group = ClientSessionGroup()
await group.connect_with_session(INFO, client.session)
anyio.run(main)
Output:
File ".../mcp/client/session_group.py", line 420, in _aggregate_components
del self._session_exit_stacks[session] # pragma: no cover
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^
KeyError: <mcp.client.session.ClientSession object at 0x77e8450e16a0>
Python & MCP Python SDK
Python 3.13.11, Linux.
mcp 2.1.0 (latest 2.x): fails at session_group.py:420
mcp 1.29.1 (latest 1.x): fails at session_group.py:409
Also reproduces on main at d8b63830.
Reported with AI assistance; I ran the reproduction above and read the output.
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
從 mcp/client/session_group.py 中 _aggregate_components 附近的第 420 行開始,然後讓 issue 中的空伺服器範例分別經過 connect_with_session() 和 connect_to_server() 執行。檢查現有的工作階段清理路徑和 disconnect_from_server();完成的標準是空伺服器不再引發 KeyError,且任何被捨棄的工作階段堆疊都能正確關閉,同時涵蓋兩條連線路徑。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- backend-api-design
- Issue 類型
- 缺陷
- 難度
- 3/5
- 預估耗時
- 1-2 天
- 活躍度
- 活躍
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 70/100