modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
A tool returning an empty list produces a CallToolResult with zero content blocks
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 1 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 31
Beschreibung
Initial Checks
- I confirm that I'm using the newest release of my line (mcp 2.0.0)
- I confirm that I searched for my issue before opening this issue
Release line
2.x
Description
A tool that returns an empty list produces a CallToolResult with zero content blocks. For a client that reads unstructured content, "no matches" and "the call returned nothing" become the same thing.
_convert_to_content (src/mcp/server/mcpserver/utilities/func_metadata.py:563) flattens a list by concatenating the conversion of each item:
if isinstance(result, list | tuple):
return list(chain.from_iterable(_convert_to_content(item) for item in result))
With zero items there is nothing to concatenate, so the result is []. That is a natural consequence of the flattening rule rather than an oversight, but it produces an asymmetry that is surprising in practice — the same "empty" answer behaves differently depending on the return type:
| tool returns | content blocks | text a client sees |
|---|---|---|
[] |
0 | '' |
[{...}, {...}] |
2 | both items |
"" |
1 | '' |
structuredContent is populated correctly in all three cases ({'result': []} for the empty list), so a client that reads structured output is unaffected. The gap is specific to clients consuming unstructured content — which is the population _convert_to_content's own docstring says it exists to serve: "retained for purposes of backwards compatibility."
Why this matters in practice. We hit it with an LLM-facing directory search. A find_person tool that legitimately found nobody returned an empty content array, and from the model's side that is indistinguishable from a call that produced nothing — so it re-tried the same lookup with cosmetic variations instead of concluding the person did not exist. Observed in one turn: find_person("Martha") → nothing → find_person("Martha Highlander") → nothing → find_person("Martha") again. Three identical searches, no answer. We work around it today by patching _convert_to_content in our own server so an empty list serializes to one TextContent holding [].
Worth noting the SDK already states this rule for tool authors — the docs advise returning [] rather than "" for an empty result — but a tool that follows that advice is exactly the one whose content array comes back empty.
Possible fix. In the list branch, when the conversion yields no blocks, emit a single TextContent with the serialized empty collection rather than an empty list. That keeps every non-empty case byte-identical and changes only the currently-empty one. I have not opened a PR: it changes output for every list-returning tool on the unstructured path, so it seemed worth agreeing on the direction (and on whether the empty-content array is considered correct as-is) before writing code. Happy to put one up if you'd like it.
Example Code
"""A tool returning an empty list yields a CallToolResult with zero content blocks."""
import asyncio
from mcp import Client
from mcp.client._memory import InMemoryTransport
from mcp.server.mcpserver import MCPServer
server = MCPServer("repro")
@server.tool()
def find_person(name: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Return matching people; an empty list means no match."""
return []
@server.tool()
def find_two(name: str) -> list[dict]:
"""Two matches, for contrast."""
return [{"name": "a"}, {"name": "b"}]
@server.tool()
def find_person_str(name: str) -> str:
"""The same answer as a string, for comparison."""
return ""
async def main() -> None:
async with Client(InMemoryTransport(server)) as client:
for tool in ("find_person", "find_two", "find_person_str"):
result = await client.call_tool(tool, {"name": "Martha"})
text = "".join(b.text for b in result.content if b.type == "text")
print(f"{tool}:")
print(f" content blocks = {len(result.content)}")
print(f" text seen by model= {text!r}")
print(f" structuredContent = {result.structured_content!r}")
asyncio.run(main())
Output:
find_person:
content blocks = 0
text seen by model= ''
structuredContent = {'result': []}
find_two:
content blocks = 2
text seen by model= '{\n "name": "a"\n}{\n "name": "b"\n}'
structuredContent = {'result': [{'name': 'a'}, {'name': 'b'}]}
find_person_str:
content blocks = 1
text seen by model= ''
structuredContent = {'result': ''}
Python & MCP Python SDK
python 3.14.3
mcp 2.0.0
platform macOS-15.6.1-arm64-arm-64bit-Mach-O
AI assistance disclosure, per CONTRIBUTING: this issue was investigated and drafted with Claude Code. The repro above was run and its output pasted verbatim, and I reviewed the whole thing before filing.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit _convert_to_content in src/mcp/server/mcpserver/utilities/func_metadata.py:563 und vergleiche dessen Verhalten bei leeren Listen mit dem dokumentierten Pfad für unstrukturierte Inhalte. Verwende die Reproduktionen find_person und find_two aus dem Issue, um zu überprüfen, dass nichtleere Ergebnisse unverändert bleiben und dass das vereinbarte Verhalten für eine leere Liste abgedeckt ist.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- api
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 2/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-3 Stunden
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 55/100