modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
Dispatcher mints a request id already used by a completed caller-supplied request (spec: ids MUST NOT be reused in a session)
Ninguém assumiu esta issue ainda.
- Linguagem predominante
- Python
- Estrelas
- 24.3k
- Forks
- 4k
- Merge médio
- 1d 1h
- PRs com merge (30d)
- 31
Descrição
Initial Checks
- I confirm that I'm using the latest version of MCP Python SDK
- I confirm that I searched for my issue in https://github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk/issues before opening this issue
Description
On current main (v2, tested at 3a6f2996), when a caller supplies its own request id via CallOptions["request_id"] (added in #3046), the dispatcher's minted-id sequence can later land on that same id after the supplied request completes. The session then sends two different requests with the same id, which the spec forbids:
The request ID MUST NOT have been previously used by the requestor within the same session.
(https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-11-25/basic#requests, same wording since 2025-03-26. The SDK pins this itself as protocol:request-id:unique in tests/interaction/_requirements.py: "ids are never reused within the session".)
Root cause
In JSONRPCDispatcher.send_raw_request (src/mcp/shared/jsonrpc_dispatcher.py, around line 338):
else:
# Mint past any key a supplied id occupies: the collision error is
# reserved for the caller who actually chose the id.
request_id = self._allocate_id()
while request_id in self._pending:
request_id = self._allocate_id()
The comment says minting should skip past any supplied id, but the guard only checks self._pending, and pending entries are popped when a request completes (line ~428). So for a supplied integer id (or numeric string, since coerce_request_id folds "2" and 2 into one key): once that request finishes, the monotonic counter eventually reaches the same value and reuses it on the wire.
DirectDispatcher._dispatch_request (src/mcp/shared/direct_dispatcher.py, around line 253) has the same pattern with self._in_flight_ids, which is discarded in the finally.
Why it matters
The receiving side is allowed to assume per-session id uniqueness. The SDK's own stateful Streamable HTTP server already mishandles duplicate ids (#3060, response cross-wiring), so an innocent client that supplies small integer ids for a few calls and then keeps using the same session can hit that server-side behavior through no fault of its own. The SDK-internal user of this feature (the subscriptions/listen driver's "listen-N" ids) is immune because non-numeric string ids never collide with the minted integer sequence, so this only bites users of the new public CallOptions["request_id"] with integer or numeric-string ids.
Note this is only about the dispatcher's own minting crossing a completed supplied id. The reverse direction (a caller re-supplying an id it already used before) is currently allowed on purpose and asserted by tests, so I left that alone.
Proposed fix
When accepting a supplied id, advance the mint counter past its coerced key so minted ids can never revisit it:
# jsonrpc_dispatcher.py, after computing pending_key for a supplied id:
if isinstance(pending_key, int):
self._next_id = max(self._next_id, pending_key)
and the same in direct_dispatcher.py with in_flight_key. Happy to open a PR with regression tests for both dispatchers if this looks right.
Example Code
import anyio
from mcp_types import JSONRPCRequest, JSONRPCResponse
from mcp.shared.jsonrpc_dispatcher import JSONRPCDispatcher
from mcp.shared.message import SessionMessage
async def main() -> None:
c2s_send, c2s_recv = anyio.create_memory_object_stream[SessionMessage | Exception](4)
s2c_send, s2c_recv = anyio.create_memory_object_stream[SessionMessage | Exception](4)
client = JSONRPCDispatcher(s2c_recv, c2s_send)
async def on_request(ctx, method, params):
return {}
async def on_notify(ctx, method, params):
pass
wire_ids = []
async def respond() -> None:
async for wire in c2s_recv:
if isinstance(wire, SessionMessage) and isinstance(wire.message, JSONRPCRequest):
wire_ids.append(wire.message.id)
await s2c_send.send(
SessionMessage(JSONRPCResponse(jsonrpc="2.0", id=wire.message.id, result={}))
)
async with anyio.create_task_group() as tg:
await tg.start(client.run, on_request, on_notify)
tg.start_soon(respond)
await client.send_raw_request("ping", None, {"request_id": 2})
await client.send_raw_request("ping", None)
await client.send_raw_request("ping", None)
tg.cancel_scope.cancel()
print("wire request ids in order:", wire_ids)
# prints: wire request ids in order: [2, 1, 2]
# the third request (dispatcher-minted) reuses the completed supplied id 2
anyio.run(main)
Python & MCP Python SDK
python: 3.14.5
mcp: main @ 3a6f2996 (v2 development line)
AI disclosure, since it's policy here: I leaned on Claude Code to help navigate the codebase and pressure-test this analysis, but I ran and verified the repro myself and I understand the fix I'm proposing. Freshman in college trying to contribute something genuinely useful, so if I've misjudged the intent behind the mint loop I'd honestly love the correction :)
Guia de contribuição
Primeiros passos
- Leia a issue inteira e depois o guia de contribuição do projeto.
- Comente na issue dizendo que vai assumir — evita que duas pessoas façam o mesmo trabalho.
- Faça um fork do repositório e trabalhe em uma branch.
- Abra um pull request que referencie o número da issue.
Direção de pesquisa
Comece com JSONRPCDispatcher.send_raw_request em src/mcp/shared/jsonrpc_dispatcher.py e DirectDispatcher._dispatch_request em src/mcp/shared/direct_dispatcher.py; em seguida, inspecione os requisitos de request-id em tests/interaction/_requirements.py. Reproduza a sequência de IDs fornecida e adicione cobertura de regressão para ambos os dispatchers; considera-se concluído quando os IDs de wire gerados nunca reutilizam, dentro de uma sessão, um ID inteiro fornecido pelo chamador que já tenha sido concluído.
Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.
Avaliação
- Stack de tecnologia
- python
- Domínio
- api, testing
- Tipo de issue
- Bug
- Dificuldade
- 3/5
- Tempo estimado
- 1-2 dias
- Status de atividade
- Ativa
- Clareza
- Claramente especificada
- Facilidade para iniciantes
- 86/100