modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk

`OAuthClientInformationFull.redirect_uris`: pydantic strict-type-equality breaks `AnyUrl(x) != AnyHttpUrl(x)` round-trip

未關閉
#2,687 3 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視

還沒有人認領這個 Issue。

auth bug fix proposed P2 ready for work
主要語言
Python
星號
24.3k
分支
4k
平均合併
1 天 1 小時
30 天內合併 PR
31

描述

Summary
When implementing a custom OAuth provider against the MCP Python SDK, callers must construct OAuthClientInformationFull instances. The SDK declares redirect_uris: list[AnyUrl] (where AnyUrl is pydantic's base URL type). Passing pydantic's stricter subtype AnyHttpUrl (or any other AnyUrl subtype) causes silent equality failures downstream: AnyUrl("https://...") == AnyHttpUrl("https://...") returns False in pydantic v2, even when the two URLs serialize identically. This breaks redirect_uri matching during the /authorize/token exchange.
Reproducer

from pydantic import AnyUrl, AnyHttpUrl
from mcp.server.auth.provider import OAuthClientInformationFull

# pydantic v2 strict-type equality
u1 = AnyUrl("https://example.com/callback")
u2 = AnyHttpUrl("https://example.com/callback")
assert str(u1) == str(u2)   # True (both render the same)
assert u1 == u2              # FAILS in pydantic v2 — different runtime types

# Concrete impact in OAuth flow:
client_info = OAuthClientInformationFull(
    client_id="test",
    redirect_uris=[AnyHttpUrl("https://example.com/cb")],
    # ...other required fields
)
# When the /authorize request arrives with redirect_uri parameter, the SDK
# constructs an AnyUrl from the query string and checks membership:
incoming = AnyUrl("https://example.com/cb")
assert incoming in client_info.redirect_uris   # FAILS — type mismatch

Expected behavior
OAuthClientInformationFull.redirect_uris should accept and compare-equal across AnyUrl and AnyUrl subtypes (AnyHttpUrl, AnyHttpsUrl, etc.) when the underlying URL is identical.
Actual behavior
Strict-type equality causes the membership check to fail. The OAuth flow returns a generic redirect-mismatch error to the client; the underlying cause (type vs URL mismatch) is invisible without instrumenting the SDK.
Suggested fix
Two options:
Coerce on assignment. Have OAuthClientInformationFull.redirect_uris field validator coerce all values to AnyUrl (the declared base type), regardless of what the caller passes. This is the cleanest fix and matches the field declaration.
Compare-by-string. Override __eq__ on the AnyUrl chain to compare-by-str() rather than by runtime type. Broader-impact change; probably not desirable.
Option 1 is preferred. A short field_validator with mode="before" converting to AnyUrl strings before pydantic instantiates would do it.
Workaround (current PolyBot mitigation)
Pass redirect_uris as raw list[str]; pydantic coerces to AnyUrl per the field declaration. This avoids the type mismatch:

client_info = OAuthClientInformationFull(
    client_id="test",
    redirect_uris=["https://example.com/cb"],   # raw strings, not AnyHttpUrl
    # ...
)

Works at runtime; loses some IDE type hints in the caller code.
Environment
mcp Python SDK version: 1.27.1
pydantic version: 2.x
Python: 3.11+
Related code locations
In the MCP SDK:
mcp/server/auth/provider.pyOAuthClientInformationFull definition with redirect_uris: list[AnyUrl]
mcp/server/auth/handlers/authorize.py — where the membership check happens
Severity
Medium — silently breaks OAuth flows in custom-provider setups; reproducer is simple; workaround is trivial once known but the failure mode is hard to diagnose from the user-facing error.

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

從這裡開始

  1. 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
  3. Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
  4. 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。

研究方向

從 mcp/server/auth/provider.py 中的 OAuthClientInformationFull 開始,追蹤 redirect_uris 的驗證,然後檢查 mcp/server/auth/handlers/authorize.py 中的 membership check。使用 issue 中的範例重現 AnyUrl/AnyHttpUrl 不相符,並為子型別輸入新增回歸測試涵蓋。完成的標準是:在 authorize-to-token 流程中,等價的 URL 能夠成功比較,而不要求呼叫端傳入原始字串。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
python
領域
authentication, backend
Issue 類型
缺陷
難度
3/5
預估耗時
1-2 天
活躍度
冷清
描述清晰度
描述清楚
新手友好度
72/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。