modelcontextprotocol / modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk
MCPServer unconditionally declares `prompts`, `resources`, `tools` capabilities on `initialize`
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 24.3k
- 派生
- 4k
- 平均合并
- 1 天 1 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 31
描述
Pre-flight
- Using the latest MCP Python SDK (
v1.27.0) and also verified againstmain @ 3d7b311 - Searched existing issues and PRs — no duplicate found
Description
Reproduced against main @ 3d7b311 (2026-04-14).
Per schema/2025-11-25/schema.ts L388-L431, each entry in ServerCapabilities is documented as "Present if the server offers any [prompt templates | resources | tools]". lifecycle.mdx also requires both peers to only use capabilities that were successfully negotiated.
Current behavior is inconsistent with the documented schema semantics: MCPServer announces prompts, resources, and tools capabilities on every initialize response, regardless of whether any prompt / resource / tool has actually been registered. A server that only exposes one tool still advertises prompts and resources it doesn't have, and an entirely empty server advertises all three.
Root cause (current main):
src/mcp/server/mcpserver/server.py#L178-L184—MCPServer.__init__unconditionally wireson_list_tools=self._handle_list_tools,on_list_resources=...,on_list_prompts=...into the lowlevelServer(...).src/mcp/server/lowlevel/server.py#L205-L224—Server.__init__unconditionally populatesself._request_handlerswith"tools/list","resources/list","prompts/list"entries.src/mcp/server/lowlevel/server.py#L283-L328—get_capabilities()derives capability entries from key presence in_request_handlers, so all three are always included.
This behavior was carried over verbatim from FastMCP._setup_handlers() in the #1951 rename — the symptom pre-dates the refactor.
The maintainer TODO at lowlevel/server.py#L249-L253 (Rethink capabilities API ... Consider deriving capabilities entirely from server state) points to the same area — happy to align a fix with whatever direction you have in mind there.
Expected: capability entries should only appear when the corresponding primitive is actually offered (registered via decorator or add_*()).
Example Code
# empty_server.py
from mcp.server.mcpserver import MCPServer
mcp = MCPServer("empty")
if __name__ == "__main__":
mcp.run()
# one_tool_server.py
from mcp.server.mcpserver import MCPServer
mcp = MCPServer("hello")
@mcp.tool()
def echo(text: str) -> str:
return text
if __name__ == "__main__":
mcp.run()
# probe.py — sends initialize over stdio and prints the advertised capabilities
import json, subprocess, sys
for path in ["empty_server.py", "one_tool_server.py"]:
proc = subprocess.Popen([sys.executable, path],
stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
req = {"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{
"protocolVersion":"2025-11-25","capabilities":{},
"clientInfo":{"name":"probe","version":"0"}}}
proc.stdin.write((json.dumps(req)+"\n").encode()); proc.stdin.flush()
print(path)
print(json.dumps(json.loads(proc.stdout.readline())["result"]["capabilities"], indent=2))
proc.terminate()
Actual output (both servers, identical):
{
"experimental": {},
"prompts": {"listChanged": false},
"resources": {"subscribe": false, "listChanged": false},
"tools": {"listChanged": false}
}
Expected:
empty_server.py→ noprompts,resources, ortoolsentries.one_tool_server.py→toolspresent,promptsandresourcesabsent.
Possible fixes (open to maintainer preference)
A. Filter capabilities in MCPServer based on manager state.
Post-process the ServerCapabilities returned by the lowlevel Server — omit tools / resources / prompts when the respective manager is empty. Minimal diff, keeps the decorator-after-init pattern. Could be done via a new optional capability_filter callable on the lowlevel Server, or via an override at the MCPServer layer.
B. Register list handlers lazily.
Pass on_list_tools=None etc. from MCPServer.__init__; register via the existing Server._add_request_handler on the first add_tool() / add_resource() / add_prompt(). Matches the documented "offers any X" schema semantics directly, no post-processing needed. This shifts one usage contract: primitives added via add_*() after run() would not appear in capabilities. In practice primitives are registered before run(), and post-handshake capability changes aren't supported by the spec regardless, so the regression surface is narrow — but it's worth calling out.
I'd like to take this on if you're open to a fix — please assign to me after triage, and let me know if you'd prefer a direction other than A or B.
Python & MCP Python SDK
Python 3.13
Reproduced on: v1.27.0 (released), main @ 3d7b311 (2026-04-14)
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 src/mcp/server/mcpserver/server.py 和 src/mcp/server/lowlevel/server.py 开始,重点关注 MCPServer 初始化、请求处理程序注册和 get_capabilities()。使用 empty_server.py 和 one_tool_server.py 示例复现 initialize 响应,然后检查低级 capabilities TODO。当 capabilities 反映实际注册的原语,并且示例产生预期响应时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- python
- 领域
- api, backend
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 描述清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100