Using /.well-known/ OAuth endpoints behind custom path on GKE

Question

I am running a simple MCP server (built with FastMCP) behind a gateway on GKE with an custom path defined by an HttpRoute. I am attempting to use the /.well-known/ endpoints for OAuth authentication and authorization. Unfortunately, it seems that the routes for the /.well-known/ endpoints; as well as the other OAuth endpoints /authorize, /token, /register, and /revoke, are all hardcoded in the MCP SDK within mcp/server/auth/routes.py within the create_auth_routes() function.

So, for example...

If my MCP server is deployed at https://{my-gateway}/custom/path/
However, the well-known endpoints are pointing to https://{my-gateway}/.well-known/*, which are obviously returning 404 Not Found responses.

When starting my server, I am passing the 'path' parameter in the mcp.run() command. Using my example above, my run command would look like -- mcp.run(transport="http", host="0.0.0.0", port=8080, path="/custom/path/mcp"). However, this path parameter seems to have zero effect on the OAuth well-known endpoints.

So, the question is... Is this expected behavior, and if so, how should we run MCP servers that use well-knonw OAuth endpoints behind API Proxies (Apigee, APIM, etc) or GKE Gateways that require a custom path?

Additional Context

mcp version -- 1.13.1
fastmcp version -- 2.11.4.dev128+5b433f5

Commencez dans mcp/server/auth/routes.py, au niveau de create_auth_routes(), et suivez la façon dont le chemin transmis à mcp.run() est appliqué aux routes well-known et OAuth. Reproduisez le déploiement avec un chemin personnalisé décrit pour GKE, puis déterminez si le SDK prend en charge un préfixe de route ou si le résultat documenté doit expliquer la configuration requise de la gateway. C’est terminé lorsque le comportement et la configuration prise en charge sont clairs.