Branch code coverage not working properly

I recently discovered the branch code coverage and I think it would be a very useful tool, however at the moment is buggy:

In the case above it tells me the branch 6 has no coverage, which is the case when the first three statements are false.

Here it tells me branch 2 is not covered, which is when the statement is false.

First of all maybe the fact that the statements are divided by lines shouldn't truncate the number of branches... If I put all statements in one line it would tell me that branch 8 is not covered (when all statements are false)

But most importantly as you can see branch 8 would be the one actually covered because the 'else' statement is all green. I could give you other examples where this is evident. Essentially what I am trying to say that if one of the branches is not covered at the moment the extension just says the last branch is not covered, when in fact in the case I gave you earlier I am pretty sure branch 7 (when now.equals(orarioFineEsec) equals true) is not covered, but I wouldn't know on the info that is given here.

In dem Bericht wird keine Quelldatei, kein Test und kein Einstiegspunkt genannt. Beginnen Sie damit, die in den Screenshots beschriebene Anzeige der Branch-Coverage zu reproduzieren, und verfolgen Sie, wie abgedeckte und nicht abgedeckte Branches Anweisungen zugeordnet werden. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die angezeigten Branch-Nummern und der Coverage-Status den tatsächlich nicht abgedeckten Branch sowohl in mehrzeiligen als auch in einzeiligen Fällen identifizieren.