microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
debug extension / mode for content-mapper
@andrewbranch ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 27/8/2026.
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 111k
- Fork
- 14.3k
- Merge medio
- 2g 4h
- PR unite (30g)
- 132
Descrizione
### 🔍 Search Terms
`content mapper`
`volar labs`
- only result is https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/63800 -- which doesn't seem relevant
### ✅ Viability Checklist
- [x] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- [x] This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- [x] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- [x] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- [x] This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- [x] This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
### ⭐ Suggestion
Volar has a really helpful tool for debugging mapping, here: https://volarjs.dev/core-concepts/volar-labs/
it would be great to have something similar for content-mappers
### 📃 Motivating Example
In a big project at work, I'm not seeing completions / hovers in VSCode, even though I have them in neovim and in smaller projects in vscode. the more debugging utilities available, the more I'd be able to narrow what the problem could be (config setup or otherwise)
### 💻 Use Cases
see above
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.