microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Broken assignability and quick info due to erroneously deferring keyof T since #51621
@gabritto ci sta già lavorando.
Dal 30/4/2026.
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 111k
- Fork
- 14.3k
- Merge medio
- 2g 4h
- PR unite (30g)
- 132
Descrizione
Note: This is a refiling of #61728 due to being closed due to being related to quick info display (see #62827).
Version & Regression Information
This changed in PR https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/51621
Playground Link
Code:
Poor quick info:
type BasicConditional<T> = keyof T extends any
? true
: false;
type Config = { rejectClose: true };
type Test =
Config extends {}
? {
rejectClose: BasicConditional<Config>;
}
: never;
type RejectClose = Test["rejectClose"];
// ^? keyof Config extends any ? true : false
Broken assignability (found by @Andarist, see https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/61728#issuecomment-2891710775)
type BasicConditional<T> = keyof T extends infer R ? R : never;
type Config = { rejectClose: true };
type Test = Config extends {}
? {
rejectClose: BasicConditional<Config>;
}
: never;
const test: Test["rejectClose"] = "rejectClose";
// ^ Type 'string' is not assignable to type 'BasicConditional<Config>'.
const ok: BasicConditional<Config> = "rejectClose"; // No error
Actual behavior
RejectClose's quick info is keyof Config extends any ? true : false which is un-simplified and rather ugly. In addition in the second snippet const test: Test["rejectClose"] = "rejectClose"; fails.
Expected behavior
The quick info should look nice and const test: Test["rejectClose"] = "rejectClose"; should succeed.
See https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/61999 for a TS-JS based fix.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.