Diagnostic code 8030 being incorrectly generated using JSDoc `@type` on a function.

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

### 🔎 Search Terms

Diagnostic 8030 is being generated incorrectly when using JSDoc `@type` on a method when the type is being referred to from an interface. This is using the new `tsc` LSP - version 7.0.2.

### 🕗 Version & Regression Information

- This changed between versions 7.0.0-dev.260707.2 and 7.0.2.
- This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed the FAQ for entries about new native issues being transferred into the main typescript repo.

### ⏯ Playground Link

_No response_

### 💻 Code

```ts
// types.ts
interface Example {
method (): number;
}
export {};

// code.js
const exampleFns = {
/**
* @type {Example['method']} // A JSDoc `@type` tag on a function must have a signature with the correct number of arguments.
*/
method () {
return Math.random();
}
};
```

### 🙁 Actual behavior

in this example, the diagnostic and LSP info does not tell the user that typescript is internally suffixing `| undefined` to the type. As such wrapping the type in `NonNullable` removes the error diagnostic, I do not believe this to be intended behaviour as previous iterations the golang native LSP `tsgo` (7.0.0-dev.260707.2) did not produce this diagnostic, nor did previous versions of typescript.

### 🙂 Expected behavior

The type should be properly referenced with no additional suffixing of types, as it used to.

### Additional information about the issue

_No response_

Beginne damit, die Diagnose mit types.ts und code.js unter Verwendung der gemeldeten TypeScript-Version 7.0.2 und der früheren Version 7.0.0-dev.260707.2 zu reproduzieren. Verfolge, wie die JSDoc-Referenz @type auf Example['method'] aufgelöst wird und warum | undefined hinzugefügt wird. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn der gültige Methodentyp nicht mehr die Diagnose 8030 erzeugt und eine Regressionstestabdeckung für dieses Beispiel vorhanden ist.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.