[5.9 regression] as const readonly tuple inferred as mutable through a nested generic call under a conditional-type circular constraint

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

### 🔎 Search Terms

readonly tuple stripped, as const widening, mutable tuple inference, circular constraint, F-bounded constraint, conditional type constraint, contextual inference, 5.9 regression

### 🕗 Version & Regression Information

- **Worked in 5.8.3** (and in nightlies up to and including `5.9.0-dev.20250609`)
- **Broken since `5.9.0-dev.20250610`**, including 5.9.0-beta, 5.9.2, 5.9.3, and nightly `7.1.0-dev.20260720.1`
- Bisected via npm nightlies to the June 9, 2025 merge window. The commits in that window are #61828, #61837, #61668, #61805, #61822; the behavior change is consistent with **#61668** ("Fix type variable leaks and cache inconsistencies"), which made outer type parameters in contextual types instantiate (possibly to their constraints) before inferences are made to return types of inner function calls — matching this repro's requirement of a nested generic call under a constraint-derived contextual type (see below).

### ⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?ts=5.9.3#code/JYOwLgpgTgZghgYwgAgEIHsAeAeAKgPmQG8AoZZKCOAE3RABsBPZANznoFcIAuZXEgL4kwjAA4oAwnUjhsAJUIBeZHOQRMM6gGc0WbKBjRkAVUIB+E8l4gILaMLEoMmADLAA1hHlLdOKeAhZBXwSEmoIBHo4SmQYDhAEMGA6ZAAjPQIACjZOHj4ASl5nPBCwiKiYuISklJh5NQ1A7V83T298bN45QpVQ8MjolAQ6LTBkOF4icesOAFtUoyF+iqGRsdTJtJn5xdCAej3kQBlyZABWADoATiK9AG0pieQQOYWoZAEAGmItp5fFgF1CIAUAgoVFoDGYoygwFE4mosSg6FmyDAAAsUHAtABaYYgUYojiiegQEgHZCAUHIzucABznADMNxwlBodCYyHu01+Ozen2+Gy5r3egJIuPxUAAjMhlDBMulMJlbnAvql-uMdKKwPl8vtDpSpjkuLxmeC2RzHs9ue8vlN+RbBQJVQJkCCtHBZigDRidHBkNRgJREqTDuhUgArCJjejASBQdjITwQUQ6Y2sxgitYUABMUtimX17EN7KVaVVmOQGve2qDFN82CmKYhT144oA3KCWY2tLwAESo4Dd97A9sm5gAKlEiPEUCSEC0o-GIHhUZj7GrInEOi0HCgLGAdjbqeHh7AhOJWj20VjjG9MTgMEMiQg1HTeLGUDpOZlcrzTeQ4q+XbIAA5H2QHvGq5ZrFqOo1sUDamg82z2taPx2gCQ4gHQWIBtuWh7qsr6xqAYzADoMCgCSyyDLE8SJMkIDIAA5vU6iaDoxTxO4mEAO4gPgHQsF0PRyC+YoACw5oxspYAqxYqhBGrQdWlJwWCh5mkhiwobafw8oCzrlv6CAcBUkGEXAxGsMAPqgOEmBPtWiBIFoOiZJhZl+jUIBxuuED5MgpHjPQWjoLEFFlAMlS0V5yCoixjSLuxehyLcQGekBgICUJXSiW+pw5qi0nyoqyqluqUHakAA

### 💻 Code

```ts
interface Box {
readonly value: T
}
type Content = R extends Box ? U : never
type BoxLike = Box>

declare function box(value: T): Box

declare function f>(v: R): R

declare const a: { a: number }
declare const b: { b: number }

// ❌ 5.9: Box<[{ a: number }, { b: number }]> — readonly stripped from the as-const tuple
// ✅ 5.8.3: Box
const r1 = f(box([a, b] as const))

// ✅ { value: readonly [{ a: number }, { b: number }] } — same value as a direct
// object literal keeps readonly
const r2 = f({ value: [a, b] as const })

// ✅ Box<{ readonly n: 1; readonly s: "hi" }> — readonly *properties* and literal
// types survive; only readonly tuples/arrays are affected
const r3 = f(box({ n: 1, s: 'hi' } as const))

// ✅ Box — non-recursive constraint is fine
declare function g>(v: R): R
const r4 = g(box([a, b] as const))

// ✅ Box — circular constraint via indexed
// access (no conditional type) is also fine
declare function h>(v: R): R
const r5 = h(box([a, b] as const))
```

### 🙁 Actual behavior

In `r1`, the `as const` tuple loses its `readonly` modifier: `R` is inferred as `Box<[{ a: number }, { b: number }]>` (mutable tuple). In 5.8.3 the same code inferred `Box`.

All three ingredients are required to trigger it:

1. the type parameter has a self-referential (F-bounded) constraint that goes through a **conditional type** — `R extends Box>` where `Content = R extends Box ? U : never`;
2. the argument flows through a **nested generic call** (`box(...)`) rather than being a direct literal — `r2` is fine — or a pre-typed variable;
3. the inferred type contains a **readonly tuple**. Readonly object properties and literal types under the same `as const` survive (`r3`).

Removing any one ingredient preserves `readonly`: a closed constraint (`r4`) or an indexed-access circular constraint with no conditional type (`r5`) both infer `Box`.

Ingredients 1 and 2 line up with the change described in #61668: since that PR, the return type of the inner `box(...)` call is checked against a contextual type in which the outer `R` has been instantiated to its constraint — here a conditional-type-based self-referential constraint — and somewhere in that inference path the tuple candidate's `readonly` modifier is dropped.

The same trigger also affects context-sensitive callback arguments (`f2>(body: () => R)` with an inline arrow or generator body), which is how this was originally hit: a Rust-style `Result` library exposing `gen>(body: () => Generator)` inferred `Result<[A, B], E>` from a body that returned `ok([a, b] as const)`.

### 🙂 Expected behavior

`r1` infers `Box`, as it did in 5.8.3 and consistent with `r2`, `r4`, and `r5`, which differ only in details that should not affect the tuple's readonly-ness. A `const` assertion produces a non-widening readonly tuple; inference should not convert it to a mutable one.

Note the failure mode is silent unsoundness rather than an inference error: `r1.value.push(...)` type-checks against a frozen-in-intent tuple.

### Additional information about the issue

Possibly related: #62071 (another inference regression linked to #61668), #51377 (inference failure with `T extends F`), #44821 (contextual inference at call sites with circular constraints).

Reproduisez le cas `r1` dans le Playground lié avec TypeScript 5.9.3 et comparez son type inféré avec celui de 5.8.3, en utilisant `r2`, `r4` et `r5` comme contrôles. Lisez le changement de comportement associé à #61668 et suivez le chemin d’inférence contextuelle pour l’appel imbriqué à `box` sous la contrainte circulaire conditionnelle ; le travail est terminé lorsque `r1` infère `Box` sans rendre `push` valide.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.