microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Compiler option to define output-to-input directory map for module resolution of package.json `"imports"`/`"exports"`
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 132
Beschreibung
### 🔍 Search Terms
"rootDir", "outDir", "paths", "map", "mapping", "imports", "exports", "moduleResolution", "module resolution"
### ✅ Viability Checklist
- [x] This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- [x] This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- [x] This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- [x] This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- [x] This isn't a request to add a new utility type: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/No-New-Utility-Types
- [x] This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
### ⭐ Suggestion
A TS project with `moduleResolution: bundler` (and others) uses the `rootDir` and `outDir` options to map the project's package.json `"imports"` and `"exports"` entries from `outDir` to `rootDir` directory. However, this only works for files inside `rootDir`.
A new option could be introduced for programs to define/inform that another local project compiles `rootDir` into `outDir`. This would be similar (indeed, identical in intent) to the `paths` option, but with more convenient support for package.json's `"imports"`/`"exports"` resolution, since only output-to-input directory mappings are required; with `paths`, one mapping would be required for every `"imports"` and `"exports"` entry.
### 📃 Motivating Example
Consider a project with the following structure:
```
├──📁 src
├──📁 test
├──📄 package.json
├──📄 tsconfig.json // references the other config files
├──📄 tsconfig.src.json
└──📄 tsconfig.test.json
```
```jsonc
// tsconfig.src.json
"compilerOptions": {
"module": "esnext",
"moduleResolution": "bundler",
"rootDir": "src",
"outDir": "dts",
},
"include": ["src"]
```
```jsonc
// package.json
"imports": {
"#foo": {
"types": "./dts/foo.d.ts"
}
}
```
With the previous configuration, tsc is able to resolve `#foo` imports inside `src/`, even if `dts/` has not yet been generated, because of `rootDir` and `outDir`.
The desired behavior is for `tsconfig.test.json` (for the `test/` directory) to also be able to resolve `#foo` imports before `dts/` is generated. That is, inform `tsconfig.test.json` that other program compiles `src` into `dts`. This could be achieved with a new compiler option:
```ts
// tsconfig.test.json
"": {
"dts": "src" // Inform tsc that other program compiles src into dts
}
```
### 💻 Use Cases
To resolve package.json's `"imports"` and `"exports"` output file paths by mapping them to corresponding input files. It may be seen in the previous example that this would be useful in the same way import specifier maps with `paths` is useful, but more convenient for `"imports"`/`"exports"` resolution.
### Alternatives
#### 1. `paths`
The desired behavior can be achieved with the `paths` option, but it is not as convenient since a map entry is required for every `"imports"` and `"exports"` entry, `paths` mappings are in a different file, and updating `"imports"`/`"exports"` requires a corresponding `paths` update.
```jsonc
// package.json
"imports": {
"#foo": {
"types": "./dts/foo.d.ts"
},
"#bar": {
"types": "./dts/bar.d.ts"
}
}
```
```jsonc
// tsconfig.json
"paths": {
"#foo": ["./src/foo.ts"],
"#bar": ["./src/bar.ts"]
}
```
Besides, it seems more appropriate for tsc to resolve "#" and self-reference import specifiers from paths defined by package.json `"imports"`/`"exports"` since that is, after all, their purpose.
#### 2. `customConditions`
A second alternative is using `customConditions`, but drawbacks are somewhat similar. Although with a custom condition, all map entries can be defined in package.json, more boilerplate is required:
```jsonc
// package.json
"imports": {
"#foo": {
"types": {
"dev": "./src/foo.ts",
"default": "./dts/foo.d.ts"
}
},
"#bar": {
"types": {
"dev": "./src/bar.ts",
"default": "./dts/bar.d.ts"
}
}
}
```
```jsonc
// tsconfig.json
"customConditions": ["dev"]
```
This, however, better mirrors the desired behavior; the resolution process with this configuration is very similar to the `outDir` to `rootDir` mapping tsc performs (see [package.json "imports" and self-name imports](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/modules/reference.html#packagejson-imports-and-self-name-imports)).
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Das Issue nennt keine Quelldateien oder Tests des Repositorys. Beginne damit, das Verhalten von rootDir/outDir und package.json "imports" und "exports" mit der gezeigten Einrichtung von tsconfig.src.json und tsconfig.test.json zu reproduzieren, und verfolge anschließend die bestehende Behandlung von moduleResolution. Als erledigt gilt es, wenn eine dokumentierte Compiler-Option das Ausgabeverzeichnis eines anderen Projekts wieder seinen Eingabedateien zuordnet, ohne übereinstimmende paths-Einträge zu erfordern.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 28/100