Type inference regression on function calls not saved to variables, due to #61668

🔎 Search Terms

61668 inference overload regression tuple

🕗 Version & Regression Information

• This changed in commit or PR #61668

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?ts=5.9.0-beta#code/PTAEGIDYEZMgOUBjAFgQwHYHMCmBnUAFxR1AEsMAzHAJxwyVMpoHsBbUAbQwFc2AjWgBpQeQjQpYAukRagAFLwG0APmInYAlJykAoACY4kAGzR1QlHg0JkWGULkIA5PvM0AuUAAVWbMnhwAHiVBGgA+AG4DI1NzS2tbe0cAZXE3Tx92fyD1SUjokzMmKyQbO1AeAIAVHgAHYxx5QjqGz24+UJFc7CkPUAA3FjJ9KKQ7MVBa0ABeb19sgDo6PBZjfsadTQXienk3GbC5rICFtGNjeU5HFzY3ERS0zV6tnYx5Spwa+pxNKKA

💻 Code

declare function getNum(): Promise<number>;
declare function getStr(): Promise<string>;
declare function useTuple(tuple: [number, string]): void;
const p = Promise.resolve([]).then(() => Promise.all([getNum(), getStr()])).then(useTuple);

🙁 Actual behavior

The Promise.all infers to Promise<(number|string)[]>.

🙂 Expected behavior

The Promise.all should infer Promise<[number, string]>.

Additional information about the issue

This only happens when the Promise.all call is directly returned. If I instead write

const p = Promise.all([getNum(), getStr()]);
return p;

then it infers the tuple correctly again, even without doing anything that would suggest it should infer the type differently.

This PR also impacted inference of enums: in another example, I pass {mode: new Subject(Mode.A)} into a function that fails because it infers Subject<Mode.A> while if I save a temporary const mode = new Subject(Mode.A); then it infers Subject<Mode> and passes.

從連結的 TypeScript Playground 重現開始，並比較 PR #61668 引入的推論變更。追蹤 Promise.all 的直接回傳路徑，以及與之相對的暫存變數情況，然後檢查 enum 範例，作為第二個回歸問題。完成的標準是：兩個範例都如描述般推論出 tuple 和 enum 型別，且不會使現有行為發生回歸。