The second parameter type of `apply` should be `ArrayLike<T>` instead of `T[]`

Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.

### 🔎 Search Terms

String.prototype.apply

I found #33173, but the issue was closed without a reason. The problem still persists.

### 🕗 Version & Regression Information

At least since v3.3.3 according to the Playground.

### ⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?#code/MYewdgzgLgBArgDhgXhmApgdxgVQJZhQICCATqQIYCeAFANoAMAHgCwCMANMywExesBmALoBKANwAoAMpRSBAOYA6AGakQAWwDCACwqlNIACbpFFAA5mANrTBxLljvATigA

### 💻 Code

```ts
const u8 = new Uint8Array([0x41,0x42,0x43]);
String.fromCharCode.apply(null, u8);
```

### 🙁 Actual behavior

```
Argument of type 'Uint8Array' is not assignable to parameter of type 'number[]'.
Type 'Uint8Array' is missing the following properties from type 'number[]': pop, push, concat, shift, and 3 more.(2345)
```

### 🙂 Expected behavior

no error

### Additional information about the issue

This code works fine at runtime. [ECMAScript spec](https://262.ecma-international.org/#sec-function.prototype.apply) does not require a genuine array at all. ArrayLike is sufficient.

Workarounds such as
```ts
String.fromCharCode.apply(null, Array.from(u8));
```
will impose runtime overheads.

Commencez par la reproduction liée dans TypeScript Playground et inspectez la déclaration de bibliothèque pour Function.apply, en vous concentrant sur le type du deuxième paramètre. Confirmez que la déclaration accepte l’exemple Uint8Array sans erreur tout en conservant le comportement existant de apply.

Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.