microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Type variables in type abstractions are not properly concretized
@weswigham arbeitet bereits daran.
Seit 24.1.2025.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 132
Beschreibung
🔎 Search Terms
type variables unknown
🕗 Version & Regression Information
- This changed between versions 4.9.5 and 5.0.4.
⏯ Playground Link
💻 Code
const f = <X,>(g: <A,>(b: X) => X, s: X) => g(s);
const ret = f(<B,>(x: B) => 1, "str");
// ^? const ret: unknown
🙁 Actual behavior
No type error is reported and ret is inferred as unknown type.
🙂 Expected behavior
I think a type error is reported because the call to f attempts to concretize the type variable X not only as a number but also as a string. In fact, TypeScript 4.9.5 reported a type error.
Additional information about the issue
I am not sure that TypeScript 4.9.5 was perfect. The following code is inferred to be unknown, but I think string is correct. This behavior was back to TypeScript 3.5.1.
const f = <X,>(g: <A,>(b: X) => X, s: X) => g(s);
const ret = f(<B,>(x: B) => x, "str");
// ^? const ret: unknown
// actual: ret is inferred as unknown
// expected: ret is inferred as string
I also found a strange behavior that a type variable that should have been concretized was returned without being concretized. I thought this is related, but I could be wrong. Sorry if so.
const f = <X,>(g: <A,>(x: X) => X) => g<string>;
const h = f<number>(<B,>(x: number) => 1);
// ^? const h: (x: X) => X
h(1);
// actual: type error
// expected: no type error
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.