microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

ES2017 Async Generator Suspended on `yield*` Continues Execution When Returned

Offen
#61,022 0 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 1 zugewiesene Person Auf GitHub ansehen

@rbuckton arbeitet bereits daran.

Seit 30.1.2025.

Needs Investigation
Vorherrschende Sprache
Go
Sterne
111k
Forks
14.3k
Ø Merge
2 T. 4 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
132

Beschreibung

🔎 Search Terms

es2017 async generator delegator await loop yield*

🕗 Version & Regression Information
  • This is the behavior in every version I tried, and I reviewed the FAQ for entries about async generators
⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play/?declaration=false&module=0&ts=5.8.0-dev.20250122#code/PQgEB4CcFMDNpgOwMbVAGwJYCMC8AiaAZ0WgA8AXfUYAPgCh6AKAQyIE8VQmBKUXWqADe9UGJrBQAQQAmLAA4VoM0LEgB7ALYAuUeLAALChXlFtIAO5WAdBXbziySJkXoWiAObX1kD8BnqyETABu4y2OrqANbAMOjQbNAAtIjqSsF2DkROLhRJAExJAMzWRproemJsnMiqAK4oFJjqiABUoB68wpXiYuyY0Ogy7awcXLANyE0tI3wivQvi-YMqAIwA3D29AL48vJtb4sgtROrx1ujqnfgssEqQ+DybO4y9x4hEFKCYX7gdvABtADK7E0EXQ1mqKAAkvcWBQfABdfY9d6nc6XTosCwsH7fCjWUiUXhPHrY3FfH7WGAUOqQRAAfmsKN2KKAA

💻 Code
/// <reference lib="esnext" />

(async () => {
    // Adapted from:
    // https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/release-notes/typescript-2-3.html
    async function* g() {
        yield* (async function* () {
            yield 1;
        })();

        console.log("after");
    }

    const it = g()[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
    console.log(await it.next());
    await it.return?.();
})();
🙁 Actual behavior

If you run the provided TS code directly in a modern Node process, you get the expected following output:

{ value: 1, done: false }

If you instead run the JS output code, you get:

{ value: 1, done: false }
after

Here, the downleveled code behaves differently than the source and continues execution after .return() was called in the iterator.

🙂 Expected behavior

The generated code should work like the original.

Additional information about the issue

This only seems to be an issue when yield*ing values from another generator. The following works just fine:

/// <reference lib="esnext" />

(async () => {
  async function* g() {
    yield* [1, 2];
    console.log('after');
  }

  const it = g()[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
  console.log(await it.next());
  await it.return?.();
})();

If you extract the generator into a constant and put the log in a while loop, the loop never exits:

/// <reference lib="esnext" />

(async () => {
  async function* g() {
    const x = (async function* () {
        yield 1;
      })();

    for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
      yield* x;

      console.log('after');
    }
  }

  const it = g()[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
  console.log(await it.next());
  await it.return?.();
})();
{ value: 1, done: false }
after
after
after
after
after
...

If you inline the generator from the above example, the "after" is still logged, but the loop isn't run. Only if you extract the inline generator into a separate constant and only yield that within the loop instead, it keeps going.

/// <reference lib="esnext" />

(async () => {
  async function* g() {
    for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
      yield* (async function* () {
        yield 1;
      })();

      console.log('after');
    }
  }

  const it = g()[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
  console.log(await it.next());
  await it.return?.();
})();
{ value: 1, done: false }
after

The above does not apply to generators that only yield* themselves:

/// <reference lib="esnext" />

(async () => {
  async function* id(x) {
    yield* x;
  }

  async function* g() {
    const x = (async function* () {
      yield 1;
    })();

    for (let i = 0; i < 15; i++) {
      yield* id(id(x));

      console.log('after');
    }
  }

  const it = g()[Symbol.asyncIterator]();
  console.log(await it.next());
  await it.return?.();
})();
{ value: 1, done: false }
after
after
after
after
after
...

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.