microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

`./*.d.ts` required in `exports` to avoid `Cannot be named without a reference to... not portable...`

Ouverte
#60,913 12 commentaires 3 réactions 1 personne assignée Voir sur GitHub

@weswigham y travaille déjà.

Depuis le 9/10/2025.

Needs Investigation
Langage dominant
Go
Étoiles
111k
Forks
14.4k
Merge moyen
1 j 19 h
PR mergées (30 j)
117

Description

🔎 Search Terms

The inferred type of '...' cannot be named without a reference to... This is likely not portable. A type annotation is necessary.

🕗 Version & Regression Information

Between 5.3 to 5.7 (latest)

⏯ Playground Link

No response

💻 Code
TSconfig of importing project
{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "outDir": "./lib",
    "rootDir": "./src",
    "tsBuildInfoFile": "./lib/.tsbuildinfo",

    "target": "ESNext",
    "module":"ESNext",
    "moduleResolution":"bundler",

    "composite": true,
    "declarationMap": true,
    "sourceMap": true,
    "strict": true,
    "esModuleInterop": true,
    "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true,
    "noErrorTruncation": true,
    "verbatimModuleSyntax": true,

    "emitDeclarationOnly": true,
    "skipLibCheck": true,

    "allowJs": true,

    
  },
  "include": ["src/**/*"]
}
Package.json of project BEING IMPORTED
{

  "type": "module",
  "files": [
    "lib/**/*",
    "src/**/*"
  ],
  "exports": {
    "./lib/*.d.ts": "./lib/*.d.ts",
    ".": {
      "types":"./lib/index.d.ts",
      "import":"./lib/index.js"
    }
  },
}

🙁 Actual behavior

If you do not include "./lib/*.d.ts": "./lib/*.d.ts" in the package.json of the imported project, you will receive the ...likely not portable... error.

However, in none of the documentations and searches I've seen was this written as a requirement. As a result, I assume it's a bug.

The problem with the above solution is that it exposes the .d.ts files, which causes intellisense import suggestions to suggest two imports (one from the proper path, and one from the .d.ts path).

Note:

  1. The import is a direct dependency, not a transitive dependency.
  2. Using main:./lib/index.js instead of exports:... also removes the error.
🙂 Expected behavior

Should not need to explicitly export all types

Additional information about the issue

No response

Guide de contribution

Ouvrir le guide de contribution

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.