microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Make type narrowing for destructured discriminated unions work for more types

Aperta
#59,657 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Domain: check: Control Flow Help Wanted Possible Improvement
Lingua principale
Go
Stelle
111k
Fork
14.3k
Merge medio
1g 19h
PR unite (30g)
117

Descrizione

🔍 Search Terms

discriminant union, ref, control flow guard, type narrowing

✅ Viability Checklist
⭐ Suggestion
type Ref<T> = { value: T }
type Data =
    | { ready: Ref<true>, payload: string }
    | { ready: Ref<false>, payload: null }

declare const data: Data
const { ready, payload } = data

if (ready.value) {
    payload    // <== currently inferred as "string | null" but should be "string"
}

Treat types like Ref<T> as a discriminant property in a union or find a way to narrow the type of payload

📃 Motivating Example

This is a very common use case in the Vue Pinia state store library, millions of projects use this library and have code like

const store = useDataStore()
const { ready, payload } = storeToRefs(store)

If we can improve this type narrowing behavior, the narrowed payload type can helps developer write safer code than before

// before, Non-null assertion everywhere
if (ready.value) {
    payload.xxxx()     // <=== false alert raised by typescript and developers have to use ?. or ! to avoid it
    payload?.xxxx()    // <=== ?. is unnecessary, generates dead code and brings cognitive confusion
    xxxxx(payload!)
}
xxxxx(payload!)        // <=== copied from the if block and forget to remove the ! mark, cannot receive alert from typescript

// after, everything works fine
if (ready.value) {
    payload.xxxx()
    xxxxx(payload)
}
xxxxx(payload)         // received the null check protection from typescript
💻 Use Cases

More detailed playground link

The use cases is actually shown in the motivating example.

I've dig into the checker.ts for some time and here's my findings

  1. getDiscriminantPropertyAccess cannot treat ready as a discriminant property now because it needs to check CheckFlags.Discriminant which implies CheckFlags.HasLiteralType. It's a pretty strict check and as its name describes, Ref<T> has no chance to pass this check.
  2. I'm not sure is it possible for relaxing the discriminate requirements but it seems to be a bad idea after some search. #29110 is what I found but it's a really old PR so maybe time changes now
  3. If we cannot solve it by using discriminant property narrowing, as a newbie to the typescript project, I just tried to debug the checker and have another idea
interface Ref<T> { value: T }
type ToRefs<T> = { [K in keyof T]: Ref<T[K]> }
function toRefs<T>(o: T): ToRefs<T> {
    return {} as any
}

interface DataPrepared {
    ready: true
    payload: string
}

interface DataNotPrepared {
    ready: false
    payload: null
}

type Data = DataPrepared | DataNotPrepared

declare const data: Data
const { ready, payload } = toRefs(data)

function isDataReady(d: Data): d is DataPrepared {
  return d.ready.value
}

if (isDataReady(data)) {
  ready.value     // <=== inferred as boolean but should be true
  payload.value   // <=== inferred as "string | null" but should be string
}

function assertDataReady(d: Data): asserts d is DataPrepared {}

if (ready.value) {
  assertDataReady(data)
  ready.value     // <=== inferred as true which is expected but it's narrowed by other code path
  payload.value   // <=== inferred as "string | null" but should be string
}

Can we use type predicates or assert function to add more information to payload's flow list? If it's possible, maybe we can do following steps while examine the payload

  1. check payload's symbol, if its declaration is a BindingPattern
  2. check the flow list for payload, if the narrowed data is the initializer of payload's declaration
  3. narrow the payload based on the narrowed data
  4. maybe it's gibberish but hope it helps

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Riproduci l’esempio di discriminated union destrutturata nel playground TypeScript collegato, quindi leggi checker.ts intorno a getDiscriminantPropertyAccess e all’analisi del flusso. Determina come Ref potrebbe partecipare al narrowing senza indebolire i controlli sui discriminanti esistenti. Il lavoro è completato quando l’esempio restringe payload a string quando ready.value è true, con test appropriati aggiunti per i casi supportati.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
typescript
Ambito
compilers
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
35/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.