Supply label names in tuple types using type-level strings

🔍 Search Terms

Labelled tuples

✅ Viability Checklist

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
• This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals

⭐ Suggestion

It's already possible to manually specify labels when defining a tuple type:

type MyTuple = [foo: number, bar: string];

I propose that there be some syntax to allow these labels to be supplied explicitly in mapped types, eg.

type Labels = ["foo", "bar"]
type Values = [number, string]
type MyTuple = {
    // Hypothetical syntax
    [I in keyof Values]: Values[I] as Labels[I]
}

To be clear: there is still no way to "access" labels of tuples under this proposal. It's purely a way to add extra documentation into existing type definitions.

If the provided name can be determined to be a literal string type, then the value of that literal string is used as the tuple element name. In all other cases, the element is unnamed as before.

📃 Motivating Example

There are many cases where the developer can supply useful names, such as if the tuple is somehow derived from an object type, or similar.

My particular case involves taking a user-supplied array like the following:

const path = ["examples", param("exampleId"), "line", param<number>("lineNumber")] as const;

And I use this constant to generate a type for paths, which in this case would look like:

type Path = TypeMagic<typeof path>;
// type Path = ["examples", string, "line", number]

It would be nicer if I could generate this type instead:

type Path = TypeMagic<typeof path>;
// type Path = ["examples", exampleId: string, "line", lineNumber: number]

💻 Use Cases

This came up while integrating TanStack Query into an application.

Since this is purely a documentation improvement, the workaround for the moment is to simply do without labels.

Beginne mit dem Beispiel für den mapped type und der im Issue beschriebenen motivierenden Transformation TypeMagic<typeof path>. Ermittle, wie Literal-String-Typen zu Tupel-Elementbezeichnungen werden könnten, während nicht-literal benannte Elemente unbenannt bleiben; abgeschlossen ist die Aufgabe mit einer dokumentierten, vereinbarten Syntax und dem entsprechenden Verhalten des Typsystems, ohne Änderung zur Laufzeit.