microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

TS Confuses namespace with the class on JSDoc module.exported class with static method.

Aperta
#55,875 1 commento 4 reazioni 1 assegnatario Vedi su GitHub

@sandersn ci sta già lavorando.

Dal 4/10/2023.

Bug Domain: JSDoc Help Wanted
Lingua principale
Go
Stelle
111k
Fork
14.3k
Merge medio
1g 19h
PR unite (30g)
117

Descrizione

🔎 Search Terms

"module.exports static method" "namespace vs class confusion" "namespace vs class collision" "Two different types with this name exist, but they are unrelated."

🕗 Version & Regression Information

Versions tried:

  • Version 5.3.0-dev (55d8bed85c11672b2b6f9ee3e6e1d384bef6f4da - )
  • Version 5.2.2
  • Version 5.1.6
  • Version 5.0.4
  • Version 4.9.5
⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/dev/bug-workbench/?noUnusedLocals=true&noUnusedParameters=true&checkJs=true&allowJs=true&module=1&emitDeclarationOnly=true&stripInternal=true#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-CbZ96iCE8m1udo6ApzPcPuGqfQFmrbnewSBwaRzSxzw85P3Je5xvkEuvYrgczgsBglbYP+W7Yjue4XoU4rGNehARusa6Qdi0FTOGt5ZveTL4t4AAemR1p+vrEBQSAbMgJHNi8yb-palgLEs2LoO0whuJsJC7B0IFHCcloBmk6pTEm57IAAjvAzBAqG2zrMAazbDhjLXBAer7PC-7GgyKAeJ6wKWkZarHsgSFQWpxCmYeGrJtsdBTCpzF8KxwrscWwgYHYXEbEQUjwp4hLMAAbo6njoOk8AAUAA

💻 Code
// @filename: name.js
'use strict';

/**
 * Options for the netaddress.
 * @typedef {Object} NameOptions
 * @property {String} name
 */

/**
 * Net Address
 * Represents a network address.
 */

class Name {
  /** @type {String} */
  name;

  /**
   * Create a network address.
   */

  constructor() {
    this.name = 'test';
  }

  /**
   * Inject properties from host, port, and network.
   * @param {String} name
   * @returns {this}
   */

  fromName(name) {
    this.name = name;
    return this;
  }

  /**
   * @param {String} name
   * @returns {Name}
   */

  static fromName(name) {
    return new this().fromName(name);
  }
}

/*
 * Expose
 */

module.exports = Name;
// @filename: usage.js
'use strict';

const Name = require('./name');

/** @type {Name} */
let address;

address = new Name();

address.name = 'somename';
🙁 Actual behavior

This reports an error:

Type 'import("/name")' is not assignable to type 'import("/name")'. Two different types with this name exist, but they are unrelated.
  The types returned by 'fromName(...)' are incompatible between these types.
    Type 'Name' is not assignable to type 'this'.
      'Name' is assignable to the constraint of type 'this', but 'this' could be instantiated with a different subtype of constraint 'Name'.
🙂 Expected behavior

new Name() and @type {Name} should be the same as module.exports = Name class.

Additional information about the issue

Repository format: https://github.com/nodech/type-tsjs-tests

generated declaration file for name.js is in the form:

export = Name;

declare class Name {...}
declare namespace Name { export { NameOptions } }
type NameOptions

If you remove @typedef {Object} NameOptions from the name.js, the declaration becomes

export = Name;

declare class Name {...`

and issue goes away.

More confusing

If you leave NameOptions but remove static member static fromName of the class Name, it still has namespace and class with the same name, BUT issue goes away ?

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Valutazione

Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.