microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Identities should report an error
Offen
@DanielRosenwasser arbeitet bereits daran.
Seit 12.9.2023.
Experimentation Needed
Suggestion
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 19 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 117
Beschreibung
🔍 Search Terms
Identity TS2367 impossible comparison
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of our Design Goals: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/TypeScript-Design-Goals
⭐ Suggestion
Comparing identical literal (abc, 5, false) values in an "if" it should report it as redundant/impossible, similar to what TS2367 does.
📃 Motivating Example
function foo(): false {
return false;
}
function bar(): 'a' {
return '';
}
function t1(arg: unknown) {
if ( foo() !== true ) {
}
if ( foo() === true ) {
}
if ( foo() !== false ) {
}
if ( foo() === false ) {
}
if ( bar() !== 'b' ) {
}
if ( bar() === 'b' ) {
}
if ( bar() !== 'a' ) {
}
if ( bar() === 'a' ) {
}
}
💻 Use Cases
-
What do you want to use this for?
Get rid of legacy conditions/impossible code -
What shortcomings exist with current approaches?
No error reported -
What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
None, wasting time manually checking legacy code to see what can be removed.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.