microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
OOME/Excessively deep type on upgrade from 4.9.4 to 5.x, introduced in 5.0.0-dev.20230203
@jakebailey arbeitet bereits daran.
Seit 20.6.2023.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 19 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 117
Beschreibung
Bug Report
🔎 Search Terms
tsc 5.x Out of Memory Heap
🕗 Version & Regression Information
- This is a crash
- This changed between versions 5.0.0-dev.20230202 and 5.0.0-dev.20230203
⏯ Playground Link
Unavailable, as I'm trying to compile an internal codebase, but I can provide access to our github repo if possible.
💻 Code
The "Type is excessively deep" is being triggered in code that calls this function:
export type LoadedCollaboration = Loaded<Collaboration, "parent">;
export async function getCollaborationMetadata(c: LoadedCollaboration): Promise<CollaborationMetadata> {
...
}
Where Loaded is a mapped type (which is available in our open source project):
https://github.com/stephenh/joist-ts/blob/main/packages/orm/src/loadHints.ts#L168
And the Collaboration "parent" key (from our internal project) is a union type with ~20 different types in it:
export type CollaborationParent =
| ScheduleSubPhase
| Approval
...15 others...
| ToDo
| SchedulePhase;
🙁 Actual behavior
In TS 4.9.4, our codebase compiled fine, in about 50 seconds.
I tried upgrading to TS 5.1.3, and the compile now OOMEs, and if given enough RAM, eventually after ~10-15 minutes, fails with a "Type instantiation is excessively deep and possibly infinite" error.
By using the 5.0.0 nightlies published to npm, I was able to bisect that version 5.0.0-dev.20230203 is what introducing the issue, and caused our compile times to jump from ~50 seconds -> 10+ minutes & fail with the type error.
🙂 Expected behavior
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.