Suggesion: Allow recursive/self-references in `satisfies` constraint

Suggestion

🔍 Search Terms

satisfies keyword, recursion, recursive, constraint, self referential

✅ Viability Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code

  It would only make previously rejected type assertions possible as it only widens the set of valid type restrictions.

• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code

  satisfies only exists during type checking and does not in generated JavaScript

• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions

  As above

• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)

  As above

• This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

  The same is already possible using a constrained identity function

⭐ Suggestion

It is currently not possible to reference the type of a variable that the satisfies constraint is applied on. Enabling this functionality should not be hard, as the same behavior can be recreated using a constrained identity function, see below. This would enable more precise verification of structures by the type checker.

📃 Motivating Example

// I define a (very simplified) state machine by the following type:
type States<S extends string> = Record<S, S>;

// I can then define a map of machine names to their states records:
const myMachines1 = {
  alan: {
    a: "b",
    b: "c",
    c: "c",
  },
  turing: {
    x: "y",
    y: "x",
  },
} satisfies Record<string, States<string>>;

// Problem: This is possible, though should be invalid:
const myMachines2 = {
  foo: {
    a: "x",
  },
  bar: {
    x: "a",
  }
} satisfies Record<string, States<string>>;

// Solution 1: Identity function with self-referential generic:
function defineMachines<T extends {
  [name in keyof T]: States<keyof T[name] & string>;
}>(machines: T) {
  return machines;
}

// Valid:
const myMachines3 = defineMachines({
  alan: {
    a: "b",
    b: "c",
    c: "c",
  },
  turing: {
    x: "y",
    y: "x",
  },
});

// Errors:
const myMachines4 = defineMachines({
  foo: {
    a: "x",
  },
  bar: {
    x: "a",
  }
});

// Solution 2: The same behavior should be achievable using the new `satisfies` keyword:
const myMachines5 = {
  foo: {
    a: "x",
  },
  bar: {
    x: "a",
  }
} satisfies {
  [name in keyof typeof myMachines5]: States<keyof typeof myMachines5[name] & string>;
};
// But errors: Block-scoped variable 'myMachines5' used before its declaration.

💻 Use Cases

As seen in the example above, this allows for a more precise control over (nested) type restrictions. It is already possible to self-reference type definitions, so why shouldn't this also be possible for variable declarations? The satisfies keyword does not modify the type itself to my knowledge.

Commencez par les exemples motivants de satisfies et comparez l’autoréférence rejetée avec la solution fondée sur une fonction identité contrainte. Déterminez comment les contraintes récursives devraient se comporter pour les déclarations de variables, puis vérifiez que les maps valides de machines à états sont acceptées et que les références croisées invalides sont rejetées sans modifier la sortie à l’exécution.