microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
[libdom] Allow Response / Request to be generics
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 19 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 117
Beschreibung
Suggestion
🔍 Search Terms
request, response, libdom, generic, generics, type parameters
✅ Viability Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
⭐ Suggestion
Similar to the FormData request by @wesbos in https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/43797, it would be great if the Request and Response globals could also accept generic type parameters.
This will become more relevant as more frameworks continue to increase their usage of these standard globals, also in Node.js.
Consider the following example of an App Route handler in Next.js (handling a POST request to an API route):
export async function POST(request: Request): Response {
const body = await request.json();
// ^? const body: any ❌
return new Response(JSON.stringify({
abc: 123, // ❌ POST function return type cannot check type of response body object
}))
}
What would be amazing would be something similar to this:
type RequestBody = { zzz: number };
type ResponseBody = { abc: number };
export async function POST(request: Request<RequestBody>): Response<ResponseBody> {
const body = await request.json();
// ^? const body: { zzz: number } ✅
return new Response(JSON.stringify({
abc: 123, // ✅ type checked
}))
}
📃 Motivating Example
The second example in the Suggestion section above.
💻 Use Cases
For typing the response body of API routes
Prior Art
@types/express:RequestandResponsetypes - which both accept a generic type parameter.- Next.js:
NextResponseaccepting generic parameters
Workaround
Response
Wasn't able to find a nice workaround for typing the body of a Response yet.
Request
Using Type Assertion / casting via as:
type RequestBody = { zzz: string };
export async function POST(request: Request) {
const body = await request.json() as RequestBody;
Caveats
- Arguably, the
Requestbody is unknown until runtime, so this is better handled instead with Zod or some other runtime validation. But for quick/simple projects without this validation, it's nice to be able to type the request body type.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit der Überprüfung der lib.dom-Deklarationen für die globalen Request- und Response-Objekte sowie des zugehörigen FormData-Vorschlags in Issue #43797. Kläre, wie sich generische Body-Typen auf request.json() und die Response-Typisierung auswirken sollen, während die Kompatibilität erhalten bleibt. Als abgeschlossen gilt die Aufgabe, wenn die vorgeschlagenen generischen Parameter und ihr Verhalten spezifiziert und durch die relevanten TypeScript declaration tests abgedeckt sind.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- api, web-dev
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100