microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Add the strictMathChecks option to allow for less complex code with math operations
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
Suggestion
🔍 Search Terms
"undefined math"
✅ Viability Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
⭐ Suggestion
Typescript currently produces an error when comparing undefined or null in math operations. While this may be wanted in some situations, not everyone may want this and it has been a big source of errors in my code. I would like to suggest the addition of a tsconfig option called "strictMathChecks" that would default to true (current behavior) and, when false, would allow for comparison with undefined or nan in math operations.
The reasons why I believe this would make sense are the following:
- The current alternative to this is doing Number(variable) on the variable that is producing the error, which turns it into NaN and can then be compared (always returning false) and produces the same result
- In JavaScript, you can compare null/undefined in math operations and no error will be thrown, which does the same as using NaN like shown above.
Here are some short examples:
undefined > 50 // returns false in JS but throws an error in TS
NaN < 50 // returns false and does not throw an error in TS
null <= 100 // returns true but throws an error in TS
📃 Motivating Example
TypeScript will now allow you to use undefined/null values in math operations when the strictMathChecks option is set to false. This allows for less redundant code.
💻 Use Cases
As I explained above, the workaround for this error is pointless since this syntax is valid in JS, and applying it does not change the behavior at all, so it just becomes a minor inconvenience.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
No se han indicado archivos, pruebas ni puntos de entrada. Empieza revisando el manejo de las opciones del compilador y los diagnósticos de TypeScript para undefined, null y las comparaciones matemáticas; para darlo por terminado habría que definir el valor predeterminado y el comportamiento deshabilitado de la opción, y cubrir los ejemplos enumerados.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 30/100