microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
request: add accompanying `importsNotUsedAsValues` option for declaration imports
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 111k
- Fork
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1g 19h
- PR unite (30g)
- 117
Descrizione
Suggestion
I'm looking for the ability to instruct the compiler to preserve imports as 'side-effecting' for declaration files. I'm framing this request in terms of the existing importsNotUsedAsValues option for sake of clarity but this is for declarations only.
I suspect it may require a new accompanying option to importsNotUsedAsValues called, .e.g., declarationImportsAsSideEffects
🔍 Search Terms
- declarations side effect
- importsNotUsedAsValues declarations
- import side effect declarations
✅ Viability Checklist
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
⭐ Suggestion
Based on the existing importsNotUsedAsValues behaviour, imports are emitted to .js to varying degrees. This proposal would ensure that there are accompanying imports within emitted .d.ts files to the same degree. For imports that are value-only and preserved, a "side effecting" import './a-module' would be emitted; others would remain as is
📃 Motivating Example
// plugins/my-plugin.ts
declare global {
export interface AppPlugins {
myPlugin: {some: 'value'}
}
}
export default function() { ... }
// plugin-loader.ts
declare global {
export interface AppPlugins {
corePlugin: {some: 'otherValue' }
}
}
import myPlugin from './plugins/my-plugin'
// import './plugins/my-plugin'. <---- currently required
const plugins: Plugin[] = ...
export default plugins
Compiling yields (tested 4.3.2 with importsNotUsedAsValues='preserve')
// plugin-loader.d.ts
declare global {
export interface AppPlugins {
corePlugin: {some: 'otherValue' }
}
}
// import './plugins/my-plugin' // <---- would be emitted with proposed change
declare const plugins: Plugin[];
export default plugins;
Currently, if another module were to import plugin-loader:
// app.ts
import plugins from './plugin-loader'
type PluginNames = keyof AppPlugins // 'corePlugin'
Note that the augmentation type (global/module) doesn't matter, just that they're included
💻 Use Cases
-
What do you want to use this for?
Enable plugin architectures where augmentations can be reliably expected to have been reached -
What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
"Shadow" side-effect imports to ensure declarations includeimport
What shortcomings exist with current (workaround) approach?
- Redundant, confusing to new eyes etc. In my particular use case where such code will be authored by plugin creators, any decreased DX is particularly unappealing. Worth mentioning that any missed shadow import in the chain would lead to the augmentation going unnoticed so this workaround would snowball
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia leggendo il comportamento esistente di importsNotUsedAsValues e il modo in cui vengono emessi i file di dichiarazione. Traccia il modo in cui gli import che importano solo valori vengono rappresentati nei file .d.ts generati. Il lavoro è completato quando un'opzione supportata preserva gli import con effetti collaterali richiesti nelle dichiarazioni e il comportamento copre l'esempio motivante di estensione del plugin.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- compilers
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 35/100