microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

request: add accompanying `importsNotUsedAsValues` option for declaration imports

Aperta
#44,519 1 commento 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
Lingua principale
Go
Stelle
111k
Fork
14.4k
Merge medio
1g 19h
PR unite (30g)
117

Descrizione

Suggestion

I'm looking for the ability to instruct the compiler to preserve imports as 'side-effecting' for declaration files. I'm framing this request in terms of the existing importsNotUsedAsValues option for sake of clarity but this is for declarations only.

I suspect it may require a new accompanying option to importsNotUsedAsValues called, .e.g., declarationImportsAsSideEffects

🔍 Search Terms

  • declarations side effect
  • importsNotUsedAsValues declarations
  • import side effect declarations

✅ Viability Checklist

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, new syntax sugar for JS, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

⭐ Suggestion

Based on the existing importsNotUsedAsValues behaviour, imports are emitted to .js to varying degrees. This proposal would ensure that there are accompanying imports within emitted .d.ts files to the same degree. For imports that are value-only and preserved, a "side effecting" import './a-module' would be emitted; others would remain as is

📃 Motivating Example

// plugins/my-plugin.ts
declare global {
  export interface AppPlugins {
    myPlugin: {some: 'value'}
  }
}

export default function() { ... }
// plugin-loader.ts

declare global {
  export interface AppPlugins {
    corePlugin: {some: 'otherValue' }
  }
}

import myPlugin from './plugins/my-plugin'
// import './plugins/my-plugin'.   <---- currently required

const plugins: Plugin[] = ...
export default plugins

Compiling yields (tested 4.3.2 with importsNotUsedAsValues='preserve')

// plugin-loader.d.ts

declare global {
  export interface AppPlugins {
    corePlugin: {some: 'otherValue' }
  }
}

// import './plugins/my-plugin'  // <---- would be emitted with proposed change

declare const plugins: Plugin[];
export default plugins;

Currently, if another module were to import plugin-loader:

// app.ts
import plugins from './plugin-loader'

type PluginNames = keyof AppPlugins  //  'corePlugin'

Note that the augmentation type (global/module) doesn't matter, just that they're included

💻 Use Cases

  • What do you want to use this for?
    Enable plugin architectures where augmentations can be reliably expected to have been reached

  • What workarounds are you using in the meantime?
    "Shadow" side-effect imports to ensure declarations include import

What shortcomings exist with current (workaround) approach?

  • Redundant, confusing to new eyes etc. In my particular use case where such code will be authored by plugin creators, any decreased DX is particularly unappealing. Worth mentioning that any missed shadow import in the chain would lead to the augmentation going unnoticed so this workaround would snowball

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia leggendo il comportamento esistente di importsNotUsedAsValues e il modo in cui vengono emessi i file di dichiarazione. Traccia il modo in cui gli import che importano solo valori vengono rappresentati nei file .d.ts generati. Il lavoro è completato quando un'opzione supportata preserva gli import con effetti collaterali richiesti nelle dichiarazioni e il comportamento copre l'esempio motivante di estensione del plugin.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
typescript
Ambito
compilers
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
35/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.