microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Accept de-structured elements in type predicates
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Search Terms
- type predicate
- reference binding pattern
- type predicate cannot reference
- destructured
Suggestion
The possibility to use destructured parameters in type predicates.
Use Cases
Destructuring is heavily used in functional/reactive programming, notably with rxjs where various contextual properties tend to be passed between each operator.
Having the ability to succinctly test for types would make the code more readable, e.g.:
type Example = {
a: number;
b: string | undefined;
};
const example: Example = {
a: 42,
b: 'hello';
};
of(example).pipe(
guard(({ b }): b is string => b !== undefined, 'b cannot be undefined'),
tap({ b }) => { /* b is now a string rather than a string | undefined })
);
Right now the alternative is
of(example).pipe(
guard((x): x is Omit<typeof x, 'b'> & { b: string } => x.b !== undefined, 'b cannot be undefined'),
tap({ b }) => { /* b is now a string rather than a string | undefined })
);
Or, without a predicate
of(example).pipe(
map(x => {
if (x.b === undefined) {
throw new Error();
}
return x;
}),
tap({ b }) => { /* b is now a string rather than a string | undefined })
);
Examples
function assertSomething(
{ property }: T
): property is AssertionHere {
return true;
}
This would roughly translate to something like:
function assertSomething(
obj: T
): obj is Omit<T, 'property'> & { property: AssertionHere } {
return true;
}
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or compiler entry points are identified in the issue. Start by reading the type-predicate and destructured-parameter examples, then trace how TypeScript currently validates predicate parameter and return types. Done means destructured parameters in type predicates are accepted and their narrowed types behave as shown without changing emitted JavaScript.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100