microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Can Module Resolution Cache Usage Be Improved?

Offen
#40,356 5 Kommentare 2 Reaktionen 1 zugewiesene Person Auf GitHub ansehen

@sheetalkamat arbeitet bereits daran.

Seit 02.9.2020.

In Discussion Needs Investigation Rescheduled Suggestion
Vorherrschende Sprache
Go
Sterne
111k
Forks
14.3k
Ø Merge
1 T. 19 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
117

Beschreibung

TypeScript Version: 4.1.0-dev.20200902

Search Terms:

  • module resolution cache
  • resolveModuleNamesReusingOldState
  • module resolution performance

Expected behavior:
Module resolution cache for files from a different Program is reused by resolveModuleNamesReusingOldState.

Actual behavior:
resolvedModules is always recalculated when a new Program is created.


I'm looking at a specific section of src/compiler/program.ts and see a place module resolution cache is available but unused. Utilizing this module resolution cache in my project reduced load time from ~18,768ms to ~7774ms in a specific (but common) scenario.

Suppose packages dep and main are loaded one after the other in tsserver, and main depends on dep. In this case:

  1. The language service builds a new Program for main, eventually pulling files from dep into main’s program.
  2. For dep’s SourceFile lookups, DocumentRegistry returns entries with file.resolvedModules already populated.
  3. Unfortunately the guard in resolveModuleNamesReusingOldState ignores this and always recalculates file.resolvedModules when a new Program is constructed.

I'd like help in determining whether the resolvedModules recalculation in (3) is always necessary. Here's the guard in question for reference:

https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/blob/3b502f4ec1a44c18f7e272bc7a86fe82af7704e7/src/compiler/program.ts#L1067-L1075

I applied an extremely naive patch to play with:

diff --git a/src/compiler/program.ts b/src/compiler/program.ts
index d2810a857a..c9cf14bd8c 100644
--- a/src/compiler/program.ts
+++ b/src/compiler/program.ts
@@ -1065,7 +1065,9 @@ namespace ts {
         }
 
         function resolveModuleNamesReusingOldState(moduleNames: string[], containingFile: string, file: SourceFile) {
-            if (structuralIsReused === StructureIsReused.Not && !file.ambientModuleNames.length) {
+            const everyModuleNameIsResolved = moduleNames.every(moduleName => file.resolvedModules?.get(moduleName));
+
+            if (!everyModuleNameIsResolved && structuralIsReused === StructureIsReused.Not && !file.ambientModuleNames.length) {
                 // If the old program state does not permit reusing resolutions and `file` does not contain locally defined ambient modules,
                 // the best we can do is fallback to the default logic.
                 return resolveModuleNamesWorker(moduleNames, containingFile, /*reusedNames*/ undefined, getResolvedProjectReferenceToRedirect(file.originalFileName));

With this patch and running tsserver against an experimental repo, I saw:

I'd like to provide a pull request but curious for initial thoughts before doing so. It's possible I'm misunderstanding something about module resolution that makes this performance optimization not doable. Is that the case?

Thanks in advance!

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.