Allow importing both type entity and value entity for "const enum" through "import type"

Search Terms

const enum, import, importsNotUsedAsValues

Scenario

I am a library developer, and there is a really large types.ts file in my project, which contains many interface, type, and const enum, defining a large part of types of the project, just like you do (typescript/src/compiler/types.ts).

Recently I turned on the compiler option importsNotUsedAsValues, and found some problems about const enum.

Original fileA.ts

import {
    TypeA, TypeB, TypeC,
    ConstEnumD, ConstEnumE,
} from './types.ts';

------------------

Current fileA.ts

import type {
    TypeA, TypeB, TypeC,
} from './types.ts';
import {
    ConstEnumD, ConstEnumE,
} from './types.ts';

Because the entities of enum belong to both type scope and value scope, I have to import them separately if I want to use them as values.

Now I have to separate the import of type const enum from a lot of names file by file, which is really a lot of work.

What's worse, after turning on importsNotUsedAsValues, TypeSciprt unnecessarily write require('./types.js') into fileA.js though the generated code did not access any property of require('./types.js'). In other words, it makes types.ts seems to have side effects. And this feature may affect the file reference relation of the project and lead to incorrect Rollup order.

In my mind, accessing the const enum entity in value scope is a kind of special behavior and is something that will be replaced in compile-time. There should be a way to import both type entity and value entity of const enum from a file without really requiring the file, especially when the file really has side effects.

Solution

There are 2 ways to solve this problem:

1. import both type and value for const enum through import type

import type { ConstEnumA } from './types';
//       Type↓        Value↓
const a: ConstEnumA = ConstEnumA.propA;

// ts not emit "  require('./types')  "

I prefer this method because I will not need to greatly change my code.

Breaking change?

Name conflicts may occur if there was already a name in value scope which was same with 'ConstEnumA',
but I think this is very very rare and will be prevented by linter usually. An extra compiler option can be provided to solve this.

2. check const enum in value-import

// importsNotUsedAsValues is still on

import { ConstEnumA } from './types';
//       Type↓        Value↓
const a: ConstEnumA = ConstEnumA.propA;

// ts find just "ConstEnumA" is used and it is `const enum`
// not emit "  require('./types')  "

Breaking change?

Yes. Now TS do not emit require('...') though value-import exists in the code.

Examples

A complete example of Solution 1:

import type {
    TypeA,
    TypeB,
    TypeC,
    ConstEnumA,
    TypeD,
    TypeE,
    TypeF,
    ConstEnumB,
    TypeG,
    TypeH,
    TypeI,
    ConstEnumC,
    ConstEnumD,
    TypeJ,
    TypeK,
} from './types';

const b: ConstEnumB = ConstEnumB.propA;
// compiler: OK, 0 error(s). not emit "  require('./types.js')  "

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
• This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Beginne mit den Beispielen fileA.ts und types.ts des Issues sowie dem dort beschriebenen Verhalten von importsNotUsedAsValues. Vergleiche die beiden vorgeschlagenen Lösungen und überprüfe anschließend, dass das gewählte Design die Verwendung eines const enum als Typ und Wert über import type ermöglicht, ohne require('./types.js') zu emittieren, und dabei das bestehende JavaScript-Verhalten beibehält.