microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Contextually type 'await ...' whose value is unused to 'void | PromiseLike<void>'
@rbuckton ya está trabajando en esto.
Desde el 3/9/2020.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
Search Terms
contextual type await void
Suggestion
When contextually typing an await whose expression is unused, we should use the contextual type of void:
// "today" assumes https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/39817
async function foo() {
// today: Promise<unknown>
// proposed: Promise<void>
await new Promise(resolve => {
// today: (value: unknown) => void
// proposed: (value: void) => void
resolve();
});
}
A statement like await new Promise(...) is commonly used to adapt a callback-based API where the result isn't value (such as Node's fs.writeFile). Once #39817 merges, the value argument for the resolve callback will no longer be optional unless it contains void. Since the result of the await expression above is unused, we should use void as the contextual type for the await, so that the contextual type for its operand becomes void | PromiseLike<void>, thus contextually typing the Promise construction.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code:
- This will require testing to verify
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Evaluación
Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.