Suggestion: perform excess property checks when spreading an inline object literal

TypeScript Version: 3.9.2

Search Terms:

Code

declare const someCondition: boolean;

type MyObject = { foo: number; bar?: number };

const a: MyObject = {
  foo: 1,
  bar: 2,
  // ✅ Error because `invalid` is an excess property
  invalid: 3,
};

const b: MyObject = {
  foo: 1,
  ...(someCondition
    ? {
        bar: 2,
        // ❌ `invalid` is an excess property, but we don't get an error here
        invalid: 3,
      }
    : {}),
};

In the example above, I only want to include specific properties when a condition is met. That's the only reason I'm using spread here.

I understand that TypeScript only performs excess property checks inside of object literals. Currently this does not include inline object literals which are being spread inside of another object literal.

In my experience this is a very common code pattern so it would be great if TypeScript handled this.

Expected behavior:

An error

Actual behavior:

No error

Playground Link:

Related Issues:

Comienza reproduciendo el ejemplo proporcionado de TypeScript 3.9.2 y compara la asignación directa de un literal de objeto con el caso de un spread condicional. Investiga la comprobación de propiedades sobrantes del compilador para literales de objeto inline usados en spreads. Se considera completado cuando la propiedad no válida mostrada produce un error en el caso del spread sin romper los spreads condicionales válidos.