microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Suggestion: "emitDts" option for exporting handwritten declarations

Aperta
#39,231 3 commenti 19 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
Lingua principale
Go
Stelle
111k
Fork
14.3k
Merge medio
2g 4h
PR unite (30g)
132

Descrizione

"emitDts": true for exporting handwritten declarations

Search Terms

emit .d.ts, handwritten declaration files, Project References, outDir

Suggestion

Introduce a tsconfig option "emitDts": true that will emit .d.ts source files into the outDir, taking precedence over any .js-generated .d.ts files.

Use Cases

1. Publishing handwritten declarations

Not everyone has their outDir inside their source directory. Not everyone publishes a combined set of source + generated files to npm. It's a common pattern to only publish your outDir.

The workaround is to have a separate script that copies your handwritten .d.ts into your outDir, overwriting any unwanted .js-generated declarations. This is workable but a bit cumbersome for such a common use-case.

2. Importing another project's outDir

Project References allow you to import types a from sibling project's source directory. If instead you switch to import from the sibling project's outDir (that is using "declaration": true), importing handwritten .d.ts fails because they are not emitted.

Why would people link to generated code? Because it helps simulate the experience of importing published code.

You can work-around lack of "emitDts": true by writing a build-script that copies the desired d.ts into the outdir. This works fine for tsc builds. However for IDEs (using the language service), it doesn't know about the build-script, and so always ignores the hand-written .d.ts and favours the .js-generated version. There is no work-around. Even if you overwrite the file in the outDir on disk with a build-script, the language service sees the .js-generated version.

Examples

This repo is an example of how importing handwritten .d.ts goes wrong today. Build it using tsc -b and observe...

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Related Issues

Credits: @mheiber @rricard helped create this issue.

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia dal repository della proposta collegato ed esegui tsc -b per riprodurre il comportamento descritto per app-src/app.ts e lib-src/main.d.ts. Leggi la issue correlata sull’emissione selettiva di dichiarazioni scritte manualmente e sul comportamento di Project References e outDir; il lavoro è completo quando un’opzione emitDts documentata emette file .d.ts scritti manualmente e preserva la risoluzione prevista del servizio linguistico.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
typescript
Ambito
build-system, compilers
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
25/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.