microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Suggestion: "emitDts" option for exporting handwritten declarations

Open
#39,231 3 comments 19 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
Dominant language
Go
Stars
111k
Forks
14.3k
Avg merge
2d 4h
Merged PRs (30d)
132

Description

"emitDts": true for exporting handwritten declarations

Search Terms

emit .d.ts, handwritten declaration files, Project References, outDir

Suggestion

Introduce a tsconfig option "emitDts": true that will emit .d.ts source files into the outDir, taking precedence over any .js-generated .d.ts files.

Use Cases

1. Publishing handwritten declarations

Not everyone has their outDir inside their source directory. Not everyone publishes a combined set of source + generated files to npm. It's a common pattern to only publish your outDir.

The workaround is to have a separate script that copies your handwritten .d.ts into your outDir, overwriting any unwanted .js-generated declarations. This is workable but a bit cumbersome for such a common use-case.

2. Importing another project's outDir

Project References allow you to import types a from sibling project's source directory. If instead you switch to import from the sibling project's outDir (that is using "declaration": true), importing handwritten .d.ts fails because they are not emitted.

Why would people link to generated code? Because it helps simulate the experience of importing published code.

You can work-around lack of "emitDts": true by writing a build-script that copies the desired d.ts into the outdir. This works fine for tsc builds. However for IDEs (using the language service), it doesn't know about the build-script, and so always ignores the hand-written .d.ts and favours the .js-generated version. There is no work-around. Even if you overwrite the file in the outDir on disk with a build-script, the language service sees the .js-generated version.

Examples

This repo is an example of how importing handwritten .d.ts goes wrong today. Build it using tsc -b and observe...

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Related Issues

Credits: @mheiber @rricard helped create this issue.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the linked proposal repository and run tsc -b to reproduce the behavior described for app-src/app.ts and lib-src/main.d.ts. Read the related issue about selective handwritten declaration emit and the Project References and outDir behavior; done means a documented emitDts option emits handwritten .d.ts files and preserves the intended language-service resolution.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
build-system, compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.