microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
JSDoc import integration doesn't support return-style AMD modules
@sandersn arbeitet bereits daran.
Seit 05.6.2020.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 132
Beschreibung
TypeScript Version: 4.0.0-dev.20200508
also 3.8.3 (and presumably any other version)
Search Terms:
require, AMD, exports, import, JSDoc, module
Code
mod.js
// @ts-check
define(function () {
// (1) this checks
// exports.number = 12;
// (2) this doesn't check
// var exports = {
// number: 12
// };
// return exports;
// (3) this also doesn't check
return {
number : 12
}
});
usage.js
// @ts-check
define(function(require) {
/** @type {import('mod')} */
var Mod = require('mod');
Mod.number;
});
My tsconfig is configured for JS/AMD/es5/noEmit:
"allowJs": true,
"module": "AMD",
"target": "es5",
"noEmit": true,
Expected behavior:
The import in the @type annotation in usage.js is correctly resolved for all three AMD module variants of mod.js .
Actual behavior:
Only the first variant, where number is explicitly added to exports works.
For the second and third variants, I get a compile error.
src/usage.js:4:23 - error TS2306: File 'd:/ns-prog/ts-jsdoc/src/mod.js' is not a module.
4 /** @type {import('mod')} */
Considering both (2) and (3) are valid AMD modules, I would expect this to work.
Note that JSDoc supports @exports annotation. Perhaps that could be utilized in the TypeScript-JSDoc integration?
Playground Link: N/A (I didn't see an option to have multiple files.)
Related Issues:
There's a StackOverflow question from 2016 https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37035462/importing-amd-modules-that-don-t-use-exports-with-typescript, but I didn't find any issue for it here.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.