microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Inspect interface composition hierarchy and its full set of members
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
Search Terms
interface extends hierarchy, interface extends tree, interface tree
Suggestion
Inspired by the recently introduced function call tree, I would like to propose a similar kind of feature allowing for easy inspection of an interface's hierarchical composition of other interfaces.
Use Cases
Interfaces are great for dependency inversion and its extends allows for interface segregation. This proposed inspection feature would add the kind of super fluffy developer experience that encourages both principles to be used more liberally.
Currently, when the segregated interfaces are finally composed at some kind of top level and one needs to provide all required functionalities, one would need to keep checking what members are still missing. If a member turns up by surprise, it would take recursive Ctrl+click through all subjects of extends to see where that unexpected member is required. This alone is off-putting when one deals with a complex project and would like to keep unit dependencies as small as possible.
With this proposed inspector, one would be able write a unit module, quoting its dependent interfaces without needing to worry that the final composition way up would be hard to trace. There would be very little temptation/excuse to define some kind of God-interface, whose only one or two members are used by any module at a time.
(FWIW in my projects I'm already pursuing dependency inversion in full force and it pays great maintainability dividends. Even with the recursive click-through it is still significantly easier to reason with IMO than God interfaces.)
Examples
For instance, for something like this (in reality, these interfaces would likely live in different files):
interface A { /* ... */ }
interface B { /* ... */ }
interface C extends A { /* ... */ }
interface D extends B { /* ... */ }
interface E extends C, D { /* ... */ }
would give rise to this tree upon inspecting E:
E
+- C
| +- A
+- D
| +- B
+- A
+- B
plus a view that shows all effective members of E.
I'm not sure how the listing of members would work precisely, but for starters it would be good to be able to use it to answer questions like:
- What methods do I now expect to provide?
- Why do I have to implement method
X? (For those familiar with Yarn, it would be likeyarn whyon an interface member.)
I'm sure others can come up with more suggestions on the desirable dev-experience around the core idea.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
El issue no menciona archivos, pruebas ni puntos de entrada. Empieza revisando la jerarquía de interfaces de ejemplo y las vistas solicitadas de la jerarquía y de los miembros efectivos; después, aclara la superficie de inspección y el comportamiento esperado antes de la implementación. La tarea estará completada cuando exista una forma definida de rastrear los miembros heredados y explicar por qué se requiere cada miembro.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- developer-experience, tooling
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100