microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Feature request: typed yield expression

Offen
#36,967 7 Kommentare 41 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
Vorherrschende Sprache
Go
Sterne
111k
Forks
14.3k
Ø Merge
2 T. 4 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
132

Beschreibung

Search Terms

generator, iterator, yield, type inference, co, redux-saga

Related Issues

#32523

Suggestion

Allow passing of yield operator signature to generator functions

declare function fetchUser(): Promise<User>;
function asyncAction*(yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) {
  const user = yield fetchUser(); // user type inferred to User based on yield param
  // impl
}

where yield inside params list is a pseudo-parameter similar to this.

Use Cases

Discussion of use cases is given in #32523.

My intended use is case is emulating do notation for monads with generator functions.
This implies I would normally have some generator runner that does composition defined before writing generator function, so type of expression at which generator resumes is trivially inferrable based on yielded value.

Discussion

The hard thing in typing yield expressions in is that resumed type does not depend only on passed parameters and generator type, but also on context in which the generator is run.

There is a precedent in TypeScript with similar situation -- this parameter in functions.
The situation is analogous -- what this behaves like depends on which object function is member of.

The proposal is to allow declaring contextual info about yield inside generator functions, by introducing appropriate pseudo-param.

I could see this working in two ways:

  • yield param gets erased early, it does not affect generator function signature,
    it serves merely as a contract for type-checking / inferrence inside body
function asyncAction*(yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) {
  // impl
}
typeof asyncAction == () => Generator<...>
  • yield param is preserved as type info like this param.
    then it is always present on types of shape (yield: ...) => Generator<> and defaults to (a: any) => any.
function asyncAction*(yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) {
  // impl
}
typeof asyncAction == (yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) => Generator<...>

Additionaly

  1. signature of yield must extend (a: any) => any and defaults to it
function asyncAction*(yield: number) {
  // impl
}
// Error: signature must be of shape (any => any)
  1. yielded values inside generator function body must be assignable to argument of yield signature
function asyncAction*(yield: (s: string) => void) {
  yield 7; // Error: number is not assignable to string
}
  1. this parameter has no effect on Generator<> return type, whether declared or
    other than obvious coherence guaranteed by (2)

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
    thats an opt-in feature
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
    type level feature, doesn't affect runtime behavior
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Beginne damit, das verwandte Issue #32523 sowie die generator-, iterator- und yield-Beispiele des Vorschlags zu lesen. Vergleiche die beiden vorgeschlagenen Behandlungen des Pseudo-Parameters und seiner Typisierungsregeln; als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn ein abgestimmtes Design vorliegt, das erzeugte Werte, Typen nach dem Fortsetzen, Funktionssignaturen und das bestehende Verhalten von Generator abdeckt.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Tech-Stack
typescript
Bereich
compilers
Issue-Typ
Feature
Schwierigkeit
5/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
Über eine Woche
Aktivitätsstatus
Veraltet
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
25/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.