microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Feature request: typed yield expression

Open
#36,967 7 comments 41 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Awaiting More Feedback Suggestion
Dominant language
Go
Stars
111k
Forks
14.3k
Avg merge
2d 4h
Merged PRs (30d)
132

Description

Search Terms

generator, iterator, yield, type inference, co, redux-saga

Related Issues

#32523

Suggestion

Allow passing of yield operator signature to generator functions

declare function fetchUser(): Promise<User>;
function asyncAction*(yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) {
  const user = yield fetchUser(); // user type inferred to User based on yield param
  // impl
}

where yield inside params list is a pseudo-parameter similar to this.

Use Cases

Discussion of use cases is given in #32523.

My intended use is case is emulating do notation for monads with generator functions.
This implies I would normally have some generator runner that does composition defined before writing generator function, so type of expression at which generator resumes is trivially inferrable based on yielded value.

Discussion

The hard thing in typing yield expressions in is that resumed type does not depend only on passed parameters and generator type, but also on context in which the generator is run.

There is a precedent in TypeScript with similar situation -- this parameter in functions.
The situation is analogous -- what this behaves like depends on which object function is member of.

The proposal is to allow declaring contextual info about yield inside generator functions, by introducing appropriate pseudo-param.

I could see this working in two ways:

  • yield param gets erased early, it does not affect generator function signature,
    it serves merely as a contract for type-checking / inferrence inside body
function asyncAction*(yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) {
  // impl
}
typeof asyncAction == () => Generator<...>
  • yield param is preserved as type info like this param.
    then it is always present on types of shape (yield: ...) => Generator<> and defaults to (a: any) => any.
function asyncAction*(yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) {
  // impl
}
typeof asyncAction == (yield: <R>(p: Promise<R>) => R) => Generator<...>

Additionaly

  1. signature of yield must extend (a: any) => any and defaults to it
function asyncAction*(yield: number) {
  // impl
}
// Error: signature must be of shape (any => any)
  1. yielded values inside generator function body must be assignable to argument of yield signature
function asyncAction*(yield: (s: string) => void) {
  yield 7; // Error: number is not assignable to string
}
  1. this parameter has no effect on Generator<> return type, whether declared or
    other than obvious coherence guaranteed by (2)

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
    thats an opt-in feature
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
    type level feature, doesn't affect runtime behavior
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading related issue #32523 and the proposal's generator, iterator, and yield examples. Compare the two proposed treatments of the pseudo-parameter and its typing rules; done requires an agreed design that covers yielded values, resumed types, function signatures, and existing Generator behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.