microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
When an index signature is not available, encourage using a more specific type to index the type.
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Ø Merge
- 1 T. 19 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 117
Beschreibung
Search Terms
index signature, keyof, domain: error messages
Vaguely related:
https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/issues/14951
Suggestion
When there is a type error because of a missing string index signature, add a suggestion of:
"Did you mean to use a more specific type such as keyof Thing instead of string?"
Only show this message:
- if the type used to index is within the same scope
- the object being indexed is not empty
Use Cases
Take the following example:
interface Person {
name: string;
phone: string;
}
declare const person: Person;
const get = (person: Person, key: string) => {
return person[key];
};
get(person, "name");
The error message here is:
Element implicitly has an 'any' type because expression of type 'string' can't be used to index type 'Person'.
No index signature with a parameter of type 'string' was found on type 'Person'.
This is technically correct! However, many people read this error message to mean "add an index signature to Person," rather than advising them to use a more specific type than string, like keyof Person. Adding the index signature suppresses the error, making it seem like the correct solution.
Where this doesn't work
There are some cases where this advice would not make sense:
// Did you mean to use a more specific type such as `keyof Number` instead of `string`?
1["a" as string]
Other cases I can think of so far:
- Empty objects, especially from
reduce(suppress for empty objects) - Indexing an object by number (only do this for strings?)
Object.keysandObject.entriesas discussed many, many times (require the indexing type to be in the same scope)
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne damit, die Type-Checker-Diagnose für eine fehlende String-Index-Signatur sowie die zugehörigen Tests oder den Einstiegspunkt für die Diagnosegenerierung zu finden. Verwende das Person-Beispiel und die aufgeführten Ausnahmen, um zu überprüfen, wann der Vorschlag erscheint. Als erledigt gilt die Aufgabe, wenn der gezielte Fehler den Vorschlag im keyof-Stil enthält, ohne das Verhalten für leere Objekte, die Indizierung mit Zahlen oder Schlüssel außerhalb des Gültigkeitsbereichs zu ändern.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100