microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript

Allowing subsequent property declarations of compatible types

Open
#33,699 8 comments 7 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Needs Proposal Suggestion
Dominant language
Go
Stars
111k
Forks
14.3k
Avg merge
2d 4h
Merged PRs (30d)
132

Description

Search Terms

TS2717, subsequent property declarations

Suggestion

Let's assume following code:

Library typings:

interface Dictionary<T> {
   [key: string]: T;
}
interface Foo {
   methods: Dictionary<Function>;
}

User extension:

declare module "@awesome/library" {
     interface BagOfFunctions extends Dictionary<Function> {
         wellKnownFunction(foo: number): number;
     }
     
     interface Foo {
           methods: BagOfFunctions;
      }
}

Currently, it results in TS2717. After this change, such code will be allowed.

Use Cases

Use case: Hapi allow user to define global functions with shared cache (server.method).

Unfortunely, server.methods is currently defined as Dictionary<ServerMethod> and end users aren't able to get type safety when calling them.

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the TS2717 diagnostic and the declaration-merging behavior shown in the examples. Compare the current rejection of Foo.methods with the requested acceptance of BagOfFunctions, then define coverage for compatible and incompatible redeclarations. Done means the sample extension is accepted without weakening incompatible-property errors.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.