microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Allow circular references of project references
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 111k
- Fork
- 14.3k
- Merge medio
- 1g 19h
- PR unite (30g)
- 117
Descrizione
Search Terms
circular reference project references graph
Suggestion
Currently, project reference graphs are required to be acyclical because
- Project references imply a
.d.tsfile is loaded, and.d.tsfiles can't exist before the build occurs - Only acyclic graphs can be topologically sorted
Both of these problems are solvable without too much work.
With the work done in #32028, we can effectively toggle the redirecting behavior, fixing the first issue. This would be done during the initial build phase only when an upstream project dependency isn't built yet.
The other problem is that project build order might not be predictable if we arbitrarily pick some starting point in the unsortable graph. This is fixable if we force solution authors to indicate which edges in the graph should be treated as ignored for the purposes of the topological sort:
"references": [
{ "path": "../a" },
{ "path": "../b", "circular": true },
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
{ "path": "../c" }
],
The benefits of this are:
- In case of suboptimal
.d.tsgeneration or memory pressure, developers can control where the "weak" link occurs in the build process - The build ordering is fully deterministic regardless of starting point
- Graphs can't become "accidentally" circular - this is a clear opt-in
Use Cases
npm and other package managers do allow circularities in dependency graphs, so this is apparently a thing.
We've also gotten feedback from some industry partners that they want to move to project references, but their dependency graph is circular in a way that would require a lot of work to "fix".
Examples
Given the graph:
A -> B -> C -(circular)-> A
The build order is deterministically C, B, A. During C's compilation, source file redirects from C to A are not active.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Inizia leggendo l’implementazione della build di project-reference e dell’ordinamento del grafo, insieme al lavoro descritto in #32028. Traccia il modo in cui le project references implicano reindirizzamenti dei file di dichiarazione e come l’ordine di build viene ordinato topologicamente. Il lavoro è completo quando i riferimenti circolari sono contrassegnati esplicitamente, l’ordine è deterministico e le build iniziali gestiscono i reindirizzamenti disabilitati descritti nell’esempio.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- build-system, compilers
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Abbastanza chiara
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100