microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Allow circular references of project references
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Search Terms
circular reference project references graph
Suggestion
Currently, project reference graphs are required to be acyclical because
- Project references imply a
.d.tsfile is loaded, and.d.tsfiles can't exist before the build occurs - Only acyclic graphs can be topologically sorted
Both of these problems are solvable without too much work.
With the work done in #32028, we can effectively toggle the redirecting behavior, fixing the first issue. This would be done during the initial build phase only when an upstream project dependency isn't built yet.
The other problem is that project build order might not be predictable if we arbitrarily pick some starting point in the unsortable graph. This is fixable if we force solution authors to indicate which edges in the graph should be treated as ignored for the purposes of the topological sort:
"references": [
{ "path": "../a" },
{ "path": "../b", "circular": true },
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
{ "path": "../c" }
],
The benefits of this are:
- In case of suboptimal
.d.tsgeneration or memory pressure, developers can control where the "weak" link occurs in the build process - The build ordering is fully deterministic regardless of starting point
- Graphs can't become "accidentally" circular - this is a clear opt-in
Use Cases
npm and other package managers do allow circularities in dependency graphs, so this is apparently a thing.
We've also gotten feedback from some industry partners that they want to move to project references, but their dependency graph is circular in a way that would require a lot of work to "fix".
Examples
Given the graph:
A -> B -> C -(circular)-> A
The build order is deterministically C, B, A. During C's compilation, source file redirects from C to A are not active.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the project-reference build and graph-ordering implementation, along with the work described in #32028. Trace how project references imply declaration-file redirects and how build order is topologically sorted. Done means circular references are explicitly marked, ordering is deterministic, and initial builds handle the disabled redirects described in the example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- build-system, compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100