microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Suggestion: Use typeof of declaration to define its type
Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.
- Lingua principale
- Go
- Stelle
- 111k
- Fork
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1g 19h
- PR unite (30g)
- 117
Descrizione
Search Terms
- infer variable declaration
- typeof declaration
- using typeof on current expression
- apply modifier to declaration
- generic declarations
Suggestion
I would like to use current declaration type for modifying type of variable, I'm creating, e.g.:
const foo: Readonly<typeof var> = {
bar: 'baz',
}
Maybe, there is a better syntax, that I couldn't think of.
Use Cases
Typescript infer rather narrow type from variable declaration by default, which is a good thing. Sometimes we want to widen it, so it can fit into our interfaces. Mostly, it can be done by simply declaring a variable of certain type. But sometimes, it's useful to create some object along the way and somehow extend it's inferred type(some libraries can export very complicated generic types, so explicitly writing them could be a pain)
My specific use case was caused by reselect library, when I tried to reuse some selectors.
// typeof selectors is (selector1ReturnType | selector2ReturnType | selector3ReturnType)[]
const selectors = [
state => someSelector1(state),
state => someSelector2(state),
state => someSelector3(state),
]
But this array of selectors couldn't be used in createSelector function, cause it is expecting a tuple of selectors, to correctly infer type of arguments of selector function. I tried to use as const on my declaration, but it leaded to another error, cause createSelector expects a mutable tuple(it's only a type thing, not that it really mutates the selectors, but I'm afraid, this is a really common case in all library typings, not to mark it's arguments as readonly). I also found a solution for creating tuples with function, but I don't like the fact, that static typings require some(even tiny) runtime overhead, also the solution is not generic.
For now, I ended up with something like this, using Writable type from this docs:
const selectorsConst = [
state => someSelector1(state),
state => someSelector2(state),
state => someSelector3(state),
] as const
const selectors: Writable<typeof selectorsConst> = selectorsConst as any
But this solution is not pretty also. I wanted it to look like this:
const selectorsConst: Writable<typeof var> = [
state => someSelector1(state),
state => someSelector2(state),
state => someSelector3(state),
] as const
Or even something like this(but this is out of scope of this issue):
const selectorsConst: Tuple<typeof var> = [
state => someSelector1(state),
state => someSelector2(state),
state => someSelector3(state),
]
Examples
Making a Readonly, Partial, Writable, etc. object:
const foo: Partial<typeof var> = {
bar: {
baz: 'value',
},
}
foo.bar.baz = 'new value' // Error: Object is possibly 'undefined'
Unifying object values types:
interface MyClass {
bar?: string;
baz?: string;
}
const foo: {
[key in keyof typeof var]: MyClass;
} = {
firstEntry: { bar: 'bar' },
secondEntry: { baz: 'baz' },
}
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Come iniziare
- Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
- Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
- Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
- Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.
Direzione di ricerca
Non vengono indicati file, test o punti di ingresso. Inizia esaminando come TypeScript rappresenta le query typeof, le annotazioni di tipo nelle dichiarazioni, i mapped types e l'inferenza delle tuple, quindi definisci la sintassi accettata e il relativo comportamento di type-checking; il lavoro è completato quando la proposta ha un design concordato e i corrispondenti test del compilatore.
Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.
Valutazione
- Stack tecnologico
- typescript
- Ambito
- compilers
- Tipo di issue
- Funzionalità
- Difficoltà
- 5/5
- Tempo stimato
- Più di una settimana
- Stato di attività
- Ferma
- Chiarezza
- Da chiarire
- Idoneità per principianti
- 25/100